Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28957417›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Molecular subtype specific efficacy of MEK inhibitors in pancreatic cancers.

Diána Brauswetter, Bianka Gurbi, Attila Varga, Edit Várkondi, Richárd Schwab, Gábor Bánhegyi, Orsolya Fábián, György Kéri, István Vályi-Nagy, István Peták

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. BRAFScience advances · 2023
    Article
  6. Recent advances in targeted therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. MEK Is a Potential Indirect Target in Subtypes of Head and Neck Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A PET Imaging Strategy for Interrogating Target Engagement and Oncogene Status in Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diána BrauswetterMTA-SE Pathobiochemistry Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4199-282X
Bianka GurbiMTA-SE Pathobiochemistry Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila VargaMTA-SE Pathobiochemistry Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Edit VárkondiOncompass Medicine Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Richárd SchwabOncompass Medicine Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Gábor BánhegyiMTA-SE Pathobiochemistry Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya FábiánOncompass Medicine Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
György KériMTA-SE Pathobiochemistry Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
István Vályi-NagySt. István and St. László Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
István PetákMTA-SE Pathobiochemistry Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUUnified Szent István and Szent László Hospital · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is an increasing cause of cancer related death worldwide. KRAS is the dominant oncogene in this cancer type and molecular rationale would indicate, that inhibitors of the downstream target MEK could be appropriate targeted agents, but clinical trials have failed so far to achieve statistically significant benefit in unselected patients. We aimed to identify predictive molecular biomarkers that can help to define subgroups where MEK inhibitors might be beneficial alone or in combination. Next-generation sequencing data of 50 genes in three pancreatic cancer cell lines (MiaPaCa2, BxPC3 and Panc1) were analyzed and compared to the molecular profile of 138 clinical pancreatic cancer samples to identify the molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer these cell lines represent. Luminescent cell viability assay was used to determine the sensitivity of cell lines to kinase inhibitors. Western blot was used to analyze the pathway activity of the examined cell lines. According to our cell viability and pathway activity data on these model cell lines only cells harboring the rare G12C KRAS mutation and low EGFR expression are sensitive to single MEK inhibitor (trametinib) treatment. The common G12D KRAS mutation leads to elevated baseline Akt activity, thus treatment with single MEK inhibitors fails. However, combination of MEK and Akt inhibitors are synergistic in this case. In case of wild-type KRAS and high EGFR expression MEK inhibitor induced Akt phosphorylation leads to trametinib resistance which necessitates for MEK and EGFR or Akt inhibitor combination treatment. In all we provide strong preclinical rational and possible molecular mechanism to revisit MEK inhibitor therapy in pancreatic cancer in both monotherapy and combination, based on molecular profile analysis of pancreatic cancer samples and cell lines. According to our most remarkable finding, a small subgroup of patients with G12C KRAS mutation may still benefit from MEK inhibitor monotherapy.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorErbB ReceptorsGenes, rasHumansMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMutationPancreatic NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridonesPyrimidinonesSignal TransductionErbB ReceptorsMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridonesPyrimidinonestrametinib

Identifiers

PMID28957417
PMCPMC5619833
OpenAlexW2756705158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.