Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28957405›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Clinical characteristics and survival of lung cancer patients associated with multiple primary malignancies.

Shan Shan, Jun She, Zhi-Qiang Xue, Chun-Xia Su, Shen-Xiang Ren, Feng-Ying Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spectrum ofArchives of medical science : AMS · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Characteristic of Secondary Lung Tumours in Medan.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  20. Lung cancer patients with a previous extra-pulmonary malignancy should not be considered homogeneous: a clinicopathological analysis of 3530 surgical cases.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shan ShanDepartment of Respirology, Shanghai sixth people's hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Jun SheDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhi-Qiang XueDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, PLA General Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Chun-Xia SuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shen-Xiang RenDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Feng-Ying WuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the characteristics and survival of lung cancer patients with additional malignant primary cancers.

methodsRecords of lung cancer patients newly diagnosed in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital between January 2000 and January 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with second primary lung cancer and those with lung cancer only were included for detailed analysis.

resultsOf 27642 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients, 283 patients (1.02%) suffered previous additional primary cancers. Compared with single primary lung cancer, patients with secondary lung cancer associated other primary cancers were more often women (female to male ratio 1:1.72 vs 1:2.58, P = 0.018), older (64.2 vs 60.5 years old, P<0.001), more squamous cell type (30.7% vs 20.5%, P = 0.004), less small cell (3.9% vs 15.5%, P<0.001) type, at earlier stages (17.7% vs 11.0% for stage I, P = 0.014), and more frequently with family history of cancers (7.8% vs 3.9%, P = 0.038). The most common previous primary cancers observed were colorectal (22.0%), breast (18.4%), gastric (14.4%) and larynx cancers (11.9%). Approximately 42.9% of patients were diagnosed with lung cancer 2 to 6 years after diagnosis of initial primary cancers. The survival of patients with secondary lung cancer associated other malignancies was not significantly different from those with single lung cancer (P = 0.491), while synchronous multiple primary malignancies showed worse prognosis compared with those with metachronous ones or single lung cancer (p = 0.012).

conclusionThe possibility of second primary lung cancer should always be considered during the follow-up of related cancer types, especially those with family history of cancers. Patients with secondary lung cancer associated other primary malignancies have non-inferior survival than those with single lung cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Multiple PrimaryNeoplasms, Second PrimarySurvival AnalysisTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28957405
PMCPMC5619777
OpenAlexW2756830819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.