ArticlePloS one2017
Behavior of ligand binding assays with crowded surfaces: Molecular model of antigen capture by antibody-conjugated nanoparticles.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematically Enhanced LAMP Chip for Rapid, Sensitive, and Contamination-Free Pathogen Detection.ACS measurement science au · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle Targeting with Antibodies in the Central Nervous System.BME frontiers · 2023Review
- Article
- Gold Nanostars Bioconjugation for Selective Targeting and SERS Detection of Biofluids.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Harnessing molecular recognition for localized drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2021Review
- Combination targeting of 'platelets + fibrin' enhances clot anchorage efficiency of nanoparticles for vascular drug delivery.Nanoscale · 2020Article
- Theoretical Modeling of Chemical Equilibrium in Weak Polyelectrolyte Layers on Curved Nanosystems.Polymers · 2020Review
- An Overview of Antibody Conjugated Polymeric Nanoparticles for Breast Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
- Stochastic Reaction-Diffusion Model of the Binding of Monoclonal Antibodies to CD4 Receptors on the Surface of T Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Antibody Conjugation of Nanoparticles as Therapeutics for Breast Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Advantages of Highly Spherical Gold Nanoparticles as Labels for Lateral Flow Immunoassay.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Optical Fiber Gratings Immunoassays.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ligand-receptor binding is of utmost importance in several biologically related disciplines. Ligand binding assays (LBA) use the high specificity and high affinity of ligands to detect, target or measure a specific receptors. One particular example of ligand binding assays are Antibody conjugated Nanoparticles (AcNPs), edge-cutting technologies that are present in several novel biomedical approaches for imaging, detection and treatment of diseases. However, the nano-confinement in AcNPs and LBA nanostructures introduces extra complexity in the analysis of ligand-receptor equilibriums. Because antibodies are large voluminous ligands, the effective affinity in AcNPs is often determined by antibody orientation and surface coverage. Moreover, antibodies have two binding sites introducing an extra ligand-receptor binding equilibrium. As consequence of all this, experimental or theoretical studies providing a guidelines for the prediction of the binding behavior in AcNPs are scarce. In this work, we present a set of theoretical calculations to shed light into the complex binding behavior of AcNPs and its implications in biomedical applications. To investigate the ligand-receptor binding on AcNPs, we have used a molecular theory that predicts the probability of different molecular conformations of the system depending on the local environment. We have considered two different pathways for designing these devices: covalently conjugated antibodies and streptavidin-biotin conjugated antibodies. We also explore the effects of surface coverage, bulk concentrations, nanoparticle size and antibody-antigen affinity. Overall, this work offers a series of theoretical predictions that can be used as a guide in the design of antibody conjugated nanoparticles for different applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.