Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28957364›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Age related inverse dose relation of sedatives and analgesics in the intensive care unit.

Amartya Mukhopadhyay, Bee Choo Tai, Deepa Remani, Jason Phua, Matthew Edward Cove, Yanika Kowitlawakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Critically Ill Patients: How Much Is Too Much?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amartya MukhopadhyayDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9747-5277
Bee Choo TaiSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Deepa RemaniDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Jason PhuaDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Matthew Edward CoveDivision of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Yanika KowitlawakulAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedative and analgesic practices in intensive care units (ICUs) are frequently based on anesthesia regimes but do not take account of the important patient related factors. Pharmacologic properties of sedatives and analgesics change when used as continuous infusions in ICU compared to bolus or short-term infusions during anesthesia. In a prospective observational cohort study, we investigated the association between patient related factors and sedatives/analgesics doses in patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) and their association with cessation of sedation/analgesia. We included patients expected to receive MV for at least 24 hours and excluded those with difficulty in assessing the depth of sedation. We collected data for the first 72 hours or until extubation, whichever occurred first. Multivariate analysis of variance, multivariate regression as well as logistic regression were used. The final cohort (N = 576) was predominantly male (64%) with mean (SD) age 61.7 (15.6) years, weight 63.4 (18.2) Kg, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 28.2 (8) and 30% hospital mortality. Increasing age was associated with reduced propofol and fentanyl doses requirements, adjusted to the weight (p<0.001). Factors associated with higher propofol and fentanyl doses were vasopressor use (Relative mean difference (RMD) propofol 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.90); fentanyl 1.48 (1.25-1.76) and central venous line placement (CVL, RMD propofol 1.64 (1.15-2.33); fentanyl 1.41 (1.03-1.91). Male gender was also associated with higher propofol dose (RMD 1.27 (1.06-1.49). Sedation cessation was less likely to occur in restrained patients (Odds Ratio, OR 0.48 (CI 0.30-0.78) or those receiving higher sedative/analgesic doses (OR propofol 0.98 (CI 0.97-0.99); fentanyl 0.99 (CI 0.98-0.997), independent of depth of sedation. In conclusion, increasing age is associated with the use of lower doses of sedative/analgesic in ICU, whereas CVL and vasopressor use were associated with higher doses.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnalgesiaAnalgesicsDemographyDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFentanylHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesicsFentanylHypnotics and SedativesPropofol

Identifiers

PMID28957364
PMCPMC5619735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.