Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28957318›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Use of rhodamine B to mark the body and seminal fluid of male Aedes aegypti for mark-release-recapture experiments and estimating efficacy of sterile male releases.

Brian J Johnson, Sara N Mitchell, Christopher J Paton, Jessica Stevenson, Kyran M Staunton, Nigel Snoad, Nigel Beebe, Bradley J White, Scott A Ritchie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Could SterileInsects · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Releasing incompatible males drives strong suppression across populations of wild andProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian J JohnsonCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Sara N MitchellVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA. United States of America.
Christopher J PatonCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Jessica StevensonVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA. United States of America.
Kyran M StauntonCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
Nigel SnoadVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA. United States of America.
Nigel BeebeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Bradley J WhiteVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, CA. United States of America.
Scott A RitchieCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.
James Cook University · AUAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent interest in male-based sterile insect technique (SIT) and incompatible insect technique (IIT) to control Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus populations has revealed the need for an economical, rapid diagnostic tool for determining dispersion and mating success of sterilized males in the wild. Previous reports from other insects indicated rhodamine B, a thiol-reactive fluorescent dye, administered via sugar-feeding can be used to stain the body tissue and seminal fluid of insects. Here, we report on the adaptation of this technique for male Ae. aegypti to allow for rapid assessment of competitiveness (mating success) during field releases. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE

findingsMarking was achieved by feeding males on 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 or 0.8% rhodamine B (w/v) in 50% honey solutions during free flight. All concentrations produced >95% transfer to females and successful body marking after 4 days of feeding, with 0.4 and 0.8% solutions producing the longest-lasting body marking. Importantly, rhodamine B marking had no effect on male mating competitiveness and proof-of-principle field releases demonstrated successful transfer of marked seminal fluid to females under field conditions and recapture of marked males. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results reveal rhodamine B to be a potentially useful evaluation method for male-based SIT/IIT control strategies as well as a viable body marking technique for male-based mark-release-recapture experiments without the negative side-effects of traditional marking methods. As a standalone method for use in mating competitiveness assays, rhodamine B marking is less expensive than PCR (e.g. paternity analysis) and stable isotope semen labelling methods and less time-consuming than female fertility assays used to assess competitiveness of sterilised males.

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAedesAnimalsEntomologyFemaleFluorescent DyesMaleRhodaminesSemenStaining and LabelingFluorescent Dyesrhodamine BRhodamines

Identifiers

PMID28957318
PMCPMC5634656
OpenAlexW2756558042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.