Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28956823›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2017

Sugar- and Intense-Sweetened Drinks in Australia: A Systematic Review on Cardiometabolic Risk.

Erin Hoare, Pia Varsamis, Neville Owen, David W Dunstan, Garry L Jennings, Bronwyn A Kingwell

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Blood Pressure and Tooth Loss: A Large Cross-Sectional Study with Age Mediation Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erin HoareBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne 3000, Australia. Erin.Hoare@baker.edu.au.
Pia VarsamisBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne 3000, Australia. Pia.Varsamis@baker.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8480-9621
Neville OwenBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne 3000, Australia. Neville.Owen@baker.edu.au.
David W DunstanBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne 3000, Australia. David.Dunstan@baker.edu.au.
Garry L JenningsBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne 3000, Australia. Garry.Jennings@baker.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7865-5483
Bronwyn A KingwellBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne 3000, Australia. Bronwyn.Kingwell@baker.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are consumed globally, and have been associated with adverse health outcomes, including weight gain, high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes (T2D), and cardiovascular disease (CVD). There is global variation in beverage formulation in terms of glucose and fructose concentration, which may pose unique health risks linked to glycemic control for Australian consumers. However, previous systematic reviews have overlooked Australian-based literature. A systematic review was performed to synthesise evidence for the associations between consumption of SSBs and intense-sweetened beverages with clinical cardiometabolic risk factors in the Australian population. Articles were sourced from Global Health, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Medline, and Culmative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. To be eligible for review, studies had to report on the consumption of sugar-sweetened (including fruit juice and fruit drinks) and/or intense-sweetened beverages, and at least one clinical cardiometabolic risk factor. Eighteen studies were included in this review. Research has mostly focused on the relationship between SSB consumption and adiposity-related outcomes. No studies have examined indices of glycaemic control (glucose/insulin), and the evidence for the health impact of intense-sweetened drinks is limited. In addition, studies have primarily been of cross-sectional design, and have examined children and adolescents, as opposed to adult populations. In the Australian population, there is modest but consistent evidence that SSB consumption has adverse associations with weight, but there is insufficient data to assess relationships with cardiometabolic outcomes.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineAustraliaBeveragesCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dietary SugarsFruit and Vegetable JuicesHumansMetabolic SyndromeObesityOverweightRisk FactorsSweetening AgentsWeight GainDietary SugarsSweetening Agentscardiometabolic risk factorsglycaemic controlintense-sweetened beveragessugar-sweetened beveragessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28956823
PMCPMC5691692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.