Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28956319›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2018

A Comparison of Tissue Spray and Lipid Extract Direct Injection Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for the Differentiation of Eutopic and Ectopic Endometrial Tissues.

Vitaliy Chagovets, Zhihao Wang, Alexey Kononikhin, Natalia Starodubtseva, Anna Borisova, Dinara Salimova, Igor Popov, Andrey Kozachenko, Konstantin Chingin, Huanwen Chen and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validation of Breast Cancer Margins by Tissue Spray Mass Spectrometry.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vitaliy ChagovetsV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Zhihao WangV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Alexey KononikhinV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia StarodubtsevaV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Anna BorisovaV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Dinara SalimovaV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Igor PopovV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Andrey KozachenkoV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Konstantin ChinginJiangxi Key Laboratory for Mass Spectrometry and Instrumentation, East China University of Technology, 418 Guanglan Road, Nanchang, 330013, China.
Huanwen ChenJiangxi Key Laboratory for Mass Spectrometry and Instrumentation, East China University of Technology, 418 Guanglan Road, Nanchang, 330013, China. chw8868@gmail.com.
Vladimir FrankevichV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia. vfrankevich@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9780-4579
Leila AdamyanV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
Gennady SukhikhV. I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, 4 Oparina Str, 117997, Moscow, Russia.
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I.Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation · RUEast China University of Technology · CNMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RU

Funding

International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China 2015DFA40290Russian Science Foundation (RU) 16-14-00029Science and Technology Planning Project at the Ministry of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province, China 20152ACB21013, 20161BBH80055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research revealed that tissue spray mass spectrometry enables rapid molecular profiling of biological tissues, which is of great importance for the search of disease biomarkers as well as for online surgery control. However, the payback for the high speed of analysis in tissue spray analysis is the generally lower chemical sensitivity compared with the traditional approach based on the offline chemical extraction and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry detection. In this study, high resolution mass spectrometry analysis of endometrium tissues of different localizations obtained using direct tissue spray mass spectrometry in positive ion mode is compared with the results of electrospray ionization analysis of lipid extracts. Identified features in both cases belong to three lipid classes: phosphatidylcholines, phosphoethanolamines, and sphingomyelins. Lipids coverage is validated by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry of lipid extracts. Multivariate analysis of data from both methods reveals satisfactory differentiation of eutopic and ectopic endometrium tissues. Overall, our results indicate that the chemical information provided by tissue spray ionization is sufficient to allow differentiation of endometrial tissues by localization with similar reliability but higher speed than in the traditional approach relying on offline extraction. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidEndometriosisEndometriumFemaleHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLipidsPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolaminesSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationSphingomyelinsLipidsPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolaminesSphingomyelinsAmbient mass spectrometryEndometriosisExtractive electrospray ionizationLipidomicsTissue spray

Identifiers

PMID28956319
OpenAlexW2760438969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.