Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28956273›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

Tube Feed Necrosis after Major Gastrointestinal Oncologic Surgery: Institutional Lessons and a Review of the Literature.

S A Sethuraman, V K Dhar, D A Habib, J E Sussman, S A Ahmad, S A Shah, B J Tsuei, J J Sussman, Daniel E Abbott

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Collaboration Breakdowns Between Provider Teams and Patients in Post-Surgery Care.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

S A SethuramanCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
V K DharDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
D A HabibCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J E SussmanDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
S A AhmadDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
S A ShahDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
B J TsueiDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J J SussmanDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Daniel E AbbottDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, K4/742, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. abbott@surgery.wisc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall bowel necrosis after enteral feeding through a jejunostomy tube (tube feed necrosis, TFN) is a rare, serious complication of major abdominal surgery. However, strategies to reduce the incidence and morbidity of TFN are not well established. Here, in the largest series of TFN presented to date, we report our institutional experience and a comprehensive review of the literature.

methodsEight patients who experienced TFN from 2000 to 2014 after major abdominal surgery for oncologic indications at the University of Cincinnati were reviewed. Characteristics of post-operative courses and outcomes were reviewed prior to and after a change in tube-feeding protocol. The existing literature addressing TFN over the last three decades was also reviewed.

resultsPatients with TFN ranged from 50 to 74 years old and presented with upper gastrointestinal tract malignancies amenable to surgical resection. Six and two cases of TFN occurred following pancreatectomy and esophagectomy, respectively. Prior to TF protocol changes, which included initiation at a low rate, titrating up more slowly and starting at one-half strength TF, three of six cases of TFN (50%) resulted in mortality. With the new TF protocol, there were no deaths, goal TF rate was achieved 3 days later, symptoms of TFN were recognized 3 days earlier, and re-operation was conducted 1 day earlier.

conclusionThis case series describes a change in clinical practice that is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality of TFN. Wider implementation and further refinement of this tube-feeding protocol may reduce TFN incidence at other institutions and in patients with other conditions requiring enteral nutrition.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionEsophagectomyPancreatectomyAdenocarcinomaAgedCatheterizationEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInsulinomaIntubation, GastrointestinalJejunal DiseasesJejunostomyMaleMiddle AgedNecrosisEnteral feedingMortalitySmall bowelTube feed necrosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.