Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28956266›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2018

Magnetic resonance imaging of tumor angiogenesis using dual-targeting RGD10-NGR9 ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles.

T Wu, X Ding, B Su, A K Soodeen-Lalloo, L Zhang, J-Y Shi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T WuDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
X DingCentral Laboratory, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
B SuCentral Laboratory, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
A K Soodeen-LallooDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China.
L ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China. 13816121971@163.com.
J-Y ShiDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, China. shijingyun89179@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-5184

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81572269Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 14411966400Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality No. 15ZR1434500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUsing RGD10-NGR9 dual-targeting superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles to evaluate their potential value in tumor angiogenesis magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the biodistribution in vitro and in vivo. MATERIALS AND

methodsDual-targeting RGD10-NGR9 ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles were designed and synthesized in our previous study. In vitro, prussian blue staining and phenanthroline colorimetry were conducted to evaluate binding affinity and adsorption of dual-targeting USPIO nanoparticles to αvβ3-integrin/APN positive cells. In vivo, a xenograft mouse tumor model was used to evaluate the potential of the dual-targeting nanoparticles as an MRI contrast agent. After intravenous injection, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values of MR images obtained were calculated at predetermined time-points. The iron level was detected to access the biodistribution and plasma half-time.

resultsIn vitro, dual-targeting USPIO nanoparticles bound to proliferating human umbilical vein endothelia cells with high specificity. In vivo, contrast MRI of xenograft mice using dual-targeting nanoparticles demonstrated a significant decrease in signal intensity and a greater increase in CNR than standard MRI and facilitated the imaging of tumor angiogenesis in T2*WI. In terms of biodistribution, dual-targeting USPIO nanoparticles increased to 1.83 times in tumor lesions as compared to the control. And the plasma half-time was about 6.2 h.

conclusionA novel RGD10-NGR9 dual-targeting USPIO has a great potential value as a contrast agent for the identification of tumor angiogenesis on MRI, according to the high specific affinity in vitro and in vivo.

Indexed as

A549 CellsAnimalsContrast MediaDextransHeterograftsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudeNeoplasms, ExperimentalNeovascularization, PathologicPeptidesTissue DistributionContrast MediaDextransferumoxtran-10Magnetite NanoparticlesPeptidesAngiogenesisMRIRGD–NGRTumor imagingUSPIO

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.