Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28956258›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2017

Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Diabetes: Recent Advances and Remaining Questions.

Alan Chait, Ira Goldberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Self-Report Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alan ChaitDivision of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Nutrition, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. achait@uw.edu.
Ira GoldbergDivision of Endocrinology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
New York University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Role of Serum Amyloid A in Diabetic Vascular DiseaseP01HL092969 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BORNFELDT, KARIN E. · 2008 to 2019
$23.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL092969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis article reviews current knowledge concerning diabetic dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease (CVD). It reviews strategies to reduce diabetes-associated CVD, including reducing low-density lipoprotein levels, lowering triglycerides, and increasing high-density lipoproteins (HDL). Special considerations, such as the multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome and partial lipodystrophy, and the role of glucose-lowering strategies in the management of diabetic dyslipidemia are discussed. RECENT

findingsThe strongest evidence to date for reducing CVD in diabetes comes from the use of statins. While triglyceride lowering remains inconclusive, an ongoing trial might provide some finality to this question. The role of increasing HDL remains elusive, and HDL cholesterol appears to be an unsatisfactory metric for monitoring therapy. The use of statins offers the best current way to reduce diabetes-associated CVD. However, several novel and promising approaches for the management of diabetic dyslipidemia aimed at reducing CVD are in the pipeline.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes MellitusDyslipidemiasHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsBlood GlucoseHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHypolipidemic AgentsLipidsAtherosclerosisHigh-density lipoproteinsLow-density lipoproteinsMetabolic syndromeStatinsTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID28956258
OpenAlexW2757879724

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.