Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28956115›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

CT myocardial perfusion imaging: ready for prime time?

Richard A P Takx, Csilla Celeng, U Joseph Schoepf

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Strengths and weaknesses of alternative noninvasive imaging approaches for microvascular ischemia.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Computed tomography calls out nuclear imaging in its field: It doesn't matter how you are searching but what you are looking for.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard A P TakxDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Csilla CelengDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
U Joseph SchoepfDivision of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. schoepf@musc.edu.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of functional coronary artery stenosis with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is suboptimal. Additional CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) may be helpful to identify patients with myocardial ischaemia in whom coronary revascularization therapy would be beneficial. CT-MPI adds incremental diagnostic and prognostic value over obstructive disease on CCTA. It allows for the quantitation of myocardial blood flow and calculation of coronary flow reserve and shows good correlation with KEY POINTS: • CT-MPI can improve the positive predictive value of CCTA for lesion-specific ischaemia. • CT-MPI adds incremental prognostic value over CCTA for major adverse cardiac events. • CT-MPI correlates with

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationFemaleHumansMaleMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingComputed tomographyCoronary artery diseaseIschaemiaPatient satisfactionPerfusion

Identifiers

PMID28956115
OpenAlexW2758369466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.