Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28956003›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2017

Blood brain barrier permeability of (-)-epigallocatechin gallate, its proliferation-enhancing activity of human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, and its preventive effect on age-related cognitive dysfunction in mice.

Monira Pervin, Keiko Unno, Aimi Nakagawa, Yuu Takahashi, Kazuaki Iguchi, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Minoru Hoshino, Aya Hara, Akiko Takagaki, Fumio Nanjo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Natural Compounds as Inhibitors of Aβ Peptide and Tau Aggregation.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monira PervinTea Science Center, Graduate School of Integrated Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
Keiko UnnoTea Science Center, Graduate School of Integrated Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
Aimi NakagawaDepartment of Neurophysiology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
Yuu TakahashiDepartment of Neurophysiology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
Kazuaki IguchiDepartment of Neurophysiology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
Hiroyuki YamamotoDepartment of Neurophysiology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
Minoru HoshinoDepartment of Neurophysiology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
Aya HaraFood Research Laboratories, Mitsui Norin Co. Ltd., Shizuoka 426-0133, Japan.
Akiko TakagakiFood Research Laboratories, Mitsui Norin Co. Ltd., Shizuoka 426-0133, Japan.
Fumio NanjoFood Research Laboratories, Mitsui Norin Co. Ltd., Shizuoka 426-0133, Japan.
Akira MinamiDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
Shinjiro ImaiSchool of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Tokyo University of Technology, Tokyo 192-0982, Japan.
Yoriyuki NakamuraTea Science Center, Graduate School of Integrated Pharmaceutical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan.
University of Shizuoka · JPTokyo University of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consumption of green tea catechins (GTCs) suppresses age-related cognitive dysfunction in mice. GTCs are composed of several catechins, of which epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is the most abundant, followed by epigallocatechin (EGC). Orally ingested EGCG is hydrolyzed by intestinal biota to EGC and gallic acid (GA). To understand the mechanism of action of GTCs on the brain, their permeability of the blood brain barrier (BBB) as well as their effects on cognitive function in mice and on nerve cell proliferation

methodsThe BBB permeability of EGCG, EGC and GA was examined using a BBB model kit. SAMP10, a mouse model of brain senescence, was used to test cognitive function

resultsThe

conclusionCognitive dysfunction in mice is suppressed after ingesting GTCs when a low concentration of EGCG is incorporated into the brain parenchyma via the BBB. Nerve cell proliferation/differentiation was enhanced by a low concentration of EGCG. Furthermore, the additive effect of EGC and GA suggests that EGCG sustains a preventive effect after the hydrolysis to EGC and GA.

Indexed as

8-oxodG, 8-oxodeoxyguanosineBBB, blood-brain barrierBlood-brain barrier permeabilityBrain plasticityC, (+)-catechinCognitive dysfunctionEC, (−)-epicatechinEGC, (−)-epigallocatechinEGCG, (−)-epigallocatechin gallate(−)-epigallocatechin gallateGA, gallic acidGreen tea catechinGTC, green tea catechinLC-MS/MS, liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometryLPO, lipid peroxidationMRM, multiple reaction-monitoringNerve cell proliferationSAMP10, senescence-accelerated mouse prone 10.

Identifiers

PMID28956003
PMCPMC5614586
OpenAlexW2569912524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.