ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2017
nsPEF-induced PIP
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peculiarities of Phosphatidylserine Externalization by Nano- and Microsecond Electric Pulses.The Journal of membrane biology · 2026Article
- Live, spatially-resolved imaging of absolute intracellular water content using holotomography.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- 3D-printed fiber-bundle fluorescence microscope for quantifying single-cell responses to high-power radiofrequency sources.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Involvement of Mitochondria in the Selective Response to Microsecond Pulsed Electric Fields on Healthy and Cancer Stem Cells in the Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Rapid and precise tracking of water influx and efflux across cell membranes induced by a pulsed electric field.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Action spectra and mechanisms of (in) efficiency of bipolar electric pulses at electroporation.Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Probing Nanoelectroporation and Resealing of the Cell Membrane by the Entry of CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Cytoskeletal Disruption after Electroporation and Its Significance to Pulsed Electric Field Therapies.Cancers · 2020Review
- Article
- Response of an actin network in vesicles under electric pulses.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Tracking Lysosome Migration within Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) Cells Following Exposure to Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Excitation and injury of adult ventricular cardiomyocytes by nano- to millisecond electric shocks.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Characterization of Cell Membrane Permeability In Vitro Part I: Transport Behavior Induced by Single-Pulse Electric Fields.Technology in cancer research & treatment · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell swelling and blebbing has been commonly observed following nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) exposure. The hypothesized origin of these effects is nanoporation of the plasma membrane (PM) followed by transmembrane diffusion of extracellular fluid and disassembly of cortical actin structures. This investigation will provide evidence that shows passive movement of fluid into the cell through nanopores and increase of intracellular osmotic pressure are not solely responsible for this observed phenomena. We demonstrate that phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.