ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2016
Molecular docking, a tool to determine interaction of CuO and TiO
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Folic Acid-Modified Nanoparticles to Enhance Letrozole's Anticancer Action.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Co-Existing Nanoplastics Further Exacerbates the Effects of Triclosan on the Physiological Functions of Human Serum Albumin.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Battling COVID-19 leveraging nanobiotechnology: Gold and silver nanoparticle-B-escin conjugates as SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors.Open life sciences · 2025Article
- Molecular Docking Approach for Biological Interaction of Green Synthesized Nanoparticles.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Bio synthesis, comprehensive characterization, and multifaceted therapeutic applications of BSA-Resveratrol coated platinum nanoparticles.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative molecular docking and toxicity between carbon-capped metal oxide nanoparticles and standard drugs in cancer and bacterial infections.BioImpacts : BI · 2024Article
- Experimental Methods for the Biological Evaluation of Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Risks.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Engineered Nanoparticle-Protein Interactions Influence Protein Structural Integrity and Biological Significance.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Current Strategies in Assessment of Nanotoxicity: Alternatives to In Vivo Animal Testing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Exploring the Interaction of Cobalt Oxide Nanoparticles with Albumin, Leukemia Cancer Cells and Pathogenic Bacteria by Multispectroscopic, Docking, Cellular and Antibacterial Approaches.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe study the human serum albumin (HSA) protein-CuO nanoparticle interaction to identify the specific binding site of protein with CuO nanoparticles by molecular docking and compared it with HSA-TiO
methodsThe protein structural data that was obtained using Autodock 4.2.
resultsIn case of CuO np-HSA interaction, the distances from the centre of Subdomain IIIA to Arg-472 is 2.113 Å and Lys 475, Glu 492, Ala 490, Cys 487, Ala 490 are the bound neighbouring residues with Lys 475, Glu 492 at aliphatic region. The binding energy generated was -1.64 kcal mol
conclusionsAnalysis suggests that CuO bind to suldow site II i.e subdomain III A of HSA protein where as TiO GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The structural information that derives from this study for CuO and TiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.