Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28955752›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2017

Preparation and characterization of cockle shell aragonite nanocomposite porous 3D scaffolds for bone repair.

Saffanah Khuder Mahmood, Md Zuki Abu Bakar Zakaria, Intan Shameha Binti Abdul Razak, Loqman Mohamed Yusof, Alhaji Zubair Jaji, Isa Tijani, Nahidah Ibrahim Hammadi

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Synthesis and Characterization of Porous CaCOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saffanah Khuder MahmoodDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Md Zuki Abu Bakar ZakariaDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Intan Shameha Binti Abdul RazakDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Loqman Mohamed YusofDepartment of Companion Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Alhaji Zubair JajiDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Isa TijaniLaboratory of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Biosciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Nahidah Ibrahim HammadiDepartment of Veterinary Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400 Serdang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demands for applicable tissue-engineered scaffolds that can be used to repair load-bearing segmental bone defects (SBDs) is vital and in increasing demand. In this study, seven different combinations of 3 dimensional (3D) novel nanocomposite porous structured scaffolds were fabricated to rebuild SBDs using an extraordinary blend of cockle shells (CaCo

Indexed as

3D, 3 Dimensional3D porous nanocomposite scaffold5211, cockle shells nanoparticles 50%, gelatin 25%, dextran 10%, and dextrin 15%5400, cockle shells nanoparticles 50%, gelatin 40%, dextran 5%, and dextrin 5%.6211, cockle shells nanoparticles 60%, gelatin 20%, dextran 10%, and dextrin 10%6300, cockle shells nanoparticles 60%, gelatin 30%, dextran 5%, and dextrin 5%7101, cockle shells nanoparticles 70%, gelatin 15%, dextran 5%, and dextrin 10%7200, cockle shells nanoparticles 70%, gelatin 20%, dextran 5%, and dextrin 5%8100, cockle shells nanoparticles 80%, gelatin 10%, dextran 5%, and dextrin 5%ACN, Aragonite Calcium Carbonate NanoparticlesANOVA, One-Way Analysis of VarianceAragoniteBoneBS-12, dodecyl dimethyl bataineCa10PO46OH2, Chemical structure of HydroxyapatiteCaCO3, Calcium carbonateCCN, Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticles°C, Degree CelsiusCharacterizationC-H, Carbon-Hydrogen groupcm, CentimeterC-O, Carbon-Oxygen groupCockle shellsDSC, Differential Scanning CalorimetryDW, Deionized WaterECM, Extracellular MatrixFDM, Freeze Drying MethodFTIR, Fourier Transform InfraredHA, HydroxyapatiteHf, Heat of fusionJCPDS, Joint Committee of Powder Diffraction Societymin, MinutesmL, MilliliterMPa, Megapascals (MPa or N/mm2) pascal (Pa) unit=one Newton per square meterNC, Natural coralnm, NanometerPBS, Phosphate Buffer Solution%, PercentagePet, Density of EthanolR, RadiusSBD, Segmental Bone DefectsSEM, Scanning Electron MicroscopyS.E., Standard ErrorTEM, Transmission Electron MicroscopyTg, Glass transition TemperatureTm, Melting TemperatureT, ThicknessU/mL, Unit per milliliterW0, Dry Weight (Initial Weight)W1, Dry WeightW2, Wet WeightWd, Dry WeightWw, Wet WeightXRD, X-Ray Diffractionµm, Micrometer

Identifiers

PMID28955752
PMCPMC5614679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.