Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28955655›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2017

Oncolytic Viruses-Natural and Genetically Engineered Cancer Immunotherapies.

Sachin R Jhawar, Aditya Thandoni, Praveen K Bommareddy, Suemair Hassan, Frederick J Kohlhapp, Sharad Goyal, Jason M Schenkel, Ann W Silk, Andrew Zloza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Oncolytic viruses: advanced strategies in cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sachin R JhawarRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Aditya ThandoniRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Praveen K BommareddyRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Suemair HassanRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Frederick J KohlhappRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Sharad GoyalRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Jason M SchenkelDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Ann W SilkRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Andrew ZlozaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USJohnson University · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Chang S Chan · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has long been interest in innovating an approach by which tumor cells can be selectively and specifically targeted and destroyed. The discovery of viruses that lyse tumor cells, termed oncolytic viruses (OVs), has led to a revolution in the treatment of cancer. The potential of OVs to improve the therapeutic ratio is derived from their ability to preferentially infect and replicate in cancer cells while avoiding destruction of normal cells surrounding the tumor. Two main mechanisms exist through which these viruses are reported to improve outcomes: direct lysis of tumor cells and indirect augmentation of host anti-tumor immunity. With these factors in mind, viruses are chosen or modified to selectively target tumor cells, decrease pathogenicity to normal cells, decrease the antiviral immune response (to prevent viral clearance), and increase the antitumor immune response. While only one OV has been approved for the treatment of cancer in the United States, and only two other OVs have been approved worldwide, a wide spectrum of OVs are in various stages of preclinical development and in clinical trials. These viruses are being studied as alternatives and adjuncts to more traditional cancer therapies including surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiation, hormonal therapies, targeted therapies, and other immunotherapies. Here, we review the natural characteristics and genetically engineered modifications that enhance the effectiveness of OVs for the treatment of cancer.

Indexed as

cancer immunotherapyoncoimmunologyoncolytic virusespathogensviruses

Identifiers

PMID28955655
PMCPMC5600978
OpenAlexW2755866843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.