Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28955628›Full record

Article3 Biotech2017

Comparative transmission of Bhendi yellow vein mosaic virus by two cryptic species of the whitefly,

V Venkataravanappa, M H Kodandaram, C N Lakshminarayana Reddy, K S Shankarappa, M Krishna Reddy

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

V VenkataravanappaDivision of Plant Pathology, Central Horticultural Experimental Station, ICAR-Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessaraghatta Lake PO, Chettalli, Bangalore, 571248 India.
M H KodandaramICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi, 221305 Uttar Pradesh India.
C N Lakshminarayana ReddyDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Sericulture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Chintamani, Bangalore, 563125 Karnataka India.
K S ShankarappaDepartment of Plant Pathology, College of Horticulture, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, Bengaluru, 560065 Karnataka India.
M Krishna ReddyDivision of Plant Pathology, Plant Virology Laboratory, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessaraghatta Lake PO, Bangalore, 560089 Karnataka India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The leaf sample from okra plants showing prominent yellow vein mosaic symptoms and healthy plant without any virus symptoms were collected from farmer's field. The presence of begomovirus in the infected sample was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the amplicons were cloned and sequenced. The genome analysis showed that the isolate in the present study had 99% nucleotide identity with

Indexed as

Bemisia tabaciBhendi yellow vein mosaic virusGenetic speciesTransmission

Identifiers

PMID28955628
PMCPMC5603454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.