Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28955406›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2017

The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) Network: bringing the world's respiratory reference values together.

Brendan G Cooper, Janet Stocks, Graham L Hall, Bruce Culver, Irene Steenbruggen, Kim W Carter, Bruce Robert Thompson, Brian L Graham, Martin R Miller, Gregg Ruppel and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The efficacy of loco-regional ropivacaine analgesia via intercostal catheters after lung resection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority study.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brendan G CooperLung Function and Sleep, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Janet StocksRespiratory, Critical Care and Anaesthesia section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Graham L HallTelethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia.
Bruce CulverPulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Irene SteenbruggenPulmonary Laboratory, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Kim W CarterTelethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia.
Bruce Robert ThompsonAllergy Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Brian L GrahamDivision of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Martin R MillerInstitute of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gregg RuppelPulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO USA.
John HendersonSchool of Social and Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Carlos A Vaz FragosoDept of Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, West Haven, CT, USA.
Sanja StanojevicRespiratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) Network has become the largest resource for reference values for routine lung function testing ever assembled. This article addresses how the GLI Network came about, why it is important, and its current challenges and future directions. It is an extension of an article published in KEY POINTS: The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) Network was established as a result of international collaboration, and altruism between researchers, clinicians and industry partners. The ongoing success of the GLI relies on network members continuing to work together to further improve how lung function is reported and interpreted across all age groups around the world.The GLI Network has produced standardised lung function reference values for spirometry and gas transfer tests.GLI reference equations should be adopted immediately for spirometry and gas transfer by clinicians and physiologists worldwide.The recently established GLI data repository will allow ongoing development and evaluation of reference values, and will offer opportunities for novel research. EDUCATIONAL

aimsTo highlight the advances made by the GLI Network during the past 5 years.To highlight the importance of using GLI reference values for routine lung function testing (

Identifiers

PMID28955406
PMCPMC5607614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.