Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28955350›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

Bacterial Wilt in China: History, Current Status, and Future Perspectives.

Gaofei Jiang, Zhong Wei, Jin Xu, Huilan Chen, Yong Zhang, Xiaoman She, Alberto P Macho, Wei Ding, Boshou Liao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ThePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gaofei JiangLaboratory of Natural Products Pesticides, College of Plant Protection, Southwest UniversityChongqing, China.
Zhong WeiJiangsu Provincial Key Lab for Organic Solid Waste Utilization, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, National Engineering Research Center for Organic-Based Fertilizers, Nanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjing, China.
Jin XuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China.
Huilan ChenKey Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology, Ministry of Education, College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhan, China.
Yong ZhangResearch Center of Bioenergy and Bioremediation, College of Resources and Environment, Southwest UniversityChongqing, China.
Xiaoman ShePlant Protection Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural SciencesGuangzhou, China.
Alberto P MachoShanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institutes of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesShanghai, China.
Wei DingLaboratory of Natural Products Pesticides, College of Plant Protection, Southwest UniversityChongqing, China.
Boshou LiaoOil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesWuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial wilt caused by plant pathogenic

Indexed as

bacterial wiltChinadistributiondiversityhost range

Identifiers

PMID28955350
PMCPMC5601990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.