Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28955179›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2017

Translational Animal Models of Atopic Dermatitis for Preclinical Studies.

Britta C Martel, Paola Lovato, Wolfgang Bäumer, Thierry Olivry

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ethyl acetate fraction ofJournal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rosmarinic Acid AmelioratesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neuroimmune interactions in atopic and allergic contact dermatitis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Britta C MartelLEO Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark.
Paola LovatoLEO Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark.
Wolfgang BäumerDepartment of Molecular Biological Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Thierry OlivryDepartment of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Leo Pharma (Denmark) · DKNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a medical need to develop new treatments for patients suffering from atopic dermatitis (AD). To improve the discovery and testing of novel treatments, relevant animal models for AD are needed. Generally, these animal models mimic different aspects of the pathophysiology of human AD, such as skin barrier defects and Th2 immune bias with additional Th1 and Th22, and in some populations Th17, activation. However, the pathomechanistic characterization and pharmacological validation of these animal models are generally incomplete. In this paper, we review animal models of AD in the context of preclinical use and their possible translation to the human disease. Most of these models use mice, but we will also critically evaluate dog models of AD, as increasing information on disease mechanism show their likely relevance for the human disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsDermatitis, AtopicDisease Models, AnimalDogsHumansMiceTh17 CellsTh1 CellsTh2 Cellsallergyatopic dermatitisAtopymouse models

Identifiers

PMID28955179
PMCPMC5612183
OpenAlexW2982151297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.