ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2017
Evaluation of the cobas Cdiff Test for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Samples.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Laboratory Diagnostic Methods forAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Prevalence ofCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2026Article
- Rapid, Point-of-Care Microwave Lysis and Electrochemical Detection ofBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Overview of current detection methods and microRNA potential inWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Pragmatic Strategy for Fecal Specimen Storage and the Corresponding Test Methods forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis ofClinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020Review
- An Overview of the Molecular Methods in the Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infectious Diseases.International journal of microbiology · 2020Review
- Validation of Active Surveillance Testing for Clostridium difficile Colonization Using the cobas Cdiff Test.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2018Article
- Performance comparison of the cobas Liat and Cepheid GeneXpert systems for Clostridium difficile detection.PloS one · 2018Article
- Equivalent Performance of the CobasEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are reliable tools for the detection of toxigenic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.