Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28954846›Full record

ArticleJournal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research2018

Prevalence and predictors of US medical graduates' federal F32, mentored-K, and R01 awards: a national cohort study.

Donna B Jeffe, Dorothy A Andriole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pathways and Barriers to Careers in Academic Clinical Cancer Prevention: a Qualitative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Physician-scientists in the United States at 2020: Trends and concerns.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Gender Can Influence Student Experiences in MD-PhD Training.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An Introduction to Research Work, Scholarship, and Paving a Way to a Career in Academic Medicine.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Donna B JeffeDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7642-3777
Dorothy A AndrioleDepartment of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

PROMOTING RESEARCH CAREERS AMONG UNDERREPRESENTED MINORITY PHYSICIANSR01GM085350 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JEFFE, DONNA B · 2008 to 2021
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The size and diversity of the physician-scientist workforce are issues of national concern. In this retrospective, national cohort study of US medical school matriculants who graduated in 1997-2004, we describe the prevalence and predictors of federal F32, mentored-K, and R01 awards among physicians. In multivariable logistic regression models, we identified demographic, educational, and professional development variables independently associated with each award through August 2014, reporting adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (AOR (95% CI)). Among 117,119 graduates with complete data (97.7% of 119,906 graduates in 1997-2004), 509 (0.4%) received F32, 1740 (1.5%) received mentored-K, and 597 (0.5%) received R01 awards. Adjusting for all variables except US Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores, black (vs white) graduates were less likely to receive F32 (0.48 (0.28-0.82)), mentored-K (0.56 (0.43-0.72)), and R01 (0.48 (0.28-0.82)) awards; Hispanic graduates were less likely to receive mentored-K awards (0.68 (0.52-0.88)), and women less likely to receive F32 (0.81 (0.67-0.98)) and R01 (0.59 (0.49-0.71)) awards. After adding Step 1 scores, these race/ethnicity effects were not significant, but women (0.62 (0.51-0.75)) were still less likely to receive R01 awards. Graduates reporting both (vs neither) medical school research elective and authorship were more likely to receive F32 (1.89 (1.45-2.48)), mentored-K (2.48 (2.13-2.88)), and R01 (2.00 (1.54-2.60)) awards. Prior F32 (2.17 (1.46-3.21)) and mentored-K (28.08 (22.94-34.38)) awardees more likely received R01 awards. Findings highlight the need for research-experiential interventions along the medical education continuum to promote greater participation and diversity of US medical graduates in the federally funded, biomedical research workforce.

Indexed as

Awards and PrizesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMentorsMultivariate AnalysisPrevalenceStudents, MedicalUnited Statesbiomedical researchethnic groupsmedical educationschoolsstudents

Identifiers

PMID28954846
PMCPMC5964605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.