Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28954741›Full record

Observational studyBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2017

Evaluation of telephone first approach to demand management in English general practice: observational study.

Jennifer Newbould, Gary Abel, Sarah Ball, Jennie Corbett, Marc Elliott, Josephine Exley, Adam Martin, Catherine Saunders, Edward Wilson, Eleanor Winpenny and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. What patients want from access to UK general practice: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The impact of remote care approaches on continuity in primary care: a mixed-studies systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Access to general practice appointments and sustainable change: a focused ethnographic case study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Evolution of the general practice receptionist role and online services: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  12. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Short- and intermediate-term impact of DTC telemedicine consultations on subsequent healthcare consumption.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The changing face of missed appointments.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jennifer NewbouldCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
Gary AbelUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Smeall Building, St Luke's Campus, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK.
Sarah BallCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
Jennie CorbettCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
Marc ElliottRAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401-3208, USA.
Josephine ExleyCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
Adam MartinCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
Catherine SaundersCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
Edward WilsonCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
Eleanor WinpennyCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
Miaoqing YangCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Cambridge CB4 1YG, UK.
Martin RolandCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/13/59/40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesGeneral PracticeRemote ConsultationAttitude of Health PersonnelCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient PreferencePractice ManagementPractice Patterns, Physicians'United Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID28954741
PMCPMC5615264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.