Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28954716›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2017

Comparison of Internet and Telephone Interventions for Weight Loss Among Cancer Survivors: Randomized Controlled Trial and Feasibility Study.

Matthew Cox, Karen Basen-Engquist, Cindy L Carmack, Janice Blalock, Yisheng Li, James Murray, Louis Pisters, Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas, Jaejoon Song, Emily Cox-Martin and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01311856 (Telephone Counseling-Mailed Materials Versus Internet Weight Management Interventions in Overweight Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01311856 unknown statusnot on this map

Telephone Counseling-Mailed Materials Versus Internet Weight Management Interventions in Overweight Cancer Survivors

TypeobservationalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2011 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsBreast Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Prostate CancerArmsStandard Arm (mail/telephone), Internet Arm, Surveys and Questionnaires, Exercise and Diet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Increasing physical activity in Cancer Survivors through a Text-messaging Exercise motivation Program (ICanSTEP).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew CoxAdult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-0460
Karen Basen-EngquistCenter for Energy Balance In Cancer Prevention and Survivorship, Department of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7299-0646
Cindy L CarmackDepartment of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-7297
Janice BlalockTobacco Treatment Program, Department of Behavioral, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2893-0245
Yisheng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9847-8544
James MurrayDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5293-7573
Louis PistersDepartment of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9226-6062
Miguel Rodriguez-BigasDepartment of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3235-2102
Jaejoon SongCenter for Energy Balance In Cancer Prevention and Survivorship, Department of Behavioral Science, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0671-2191
Emily Cox-MartinDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2011-3905
Wendy Demark-WahnefriedDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5241-932X
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USOutcomes Research Consortium · USThe Medical Center of Aurora · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight loss interventions have been successfully delivered via several modalities, but recent research has focused on more disseminable and sustainable means such as telephone- or Internet-based platforms.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare an Internet-delivered weight loss intervention to a comparable telephone-delivered weight loss intervention.

methodsThis randomized pilot study examined the effects of 6-month telephone- and Internet-delivered social cognitive theory-based weight loss interventions among 37 cancer survivors. Measures of body composition, physical activity, diet, and physical performance were the outcomes of interest.

resultsParticipants in the telephone intervention (n=13) showed greater decreases in waist circumference (-0.75 cm for telephone vs -0.09 cm for Internet, P=.03) than the Internet condition (n=24), and several other outcomes trended in the same direction. Measures of engagement (eg, number of telephone sessions completed and number of log-ins) suggest differences between groups which may account for the difference in outcomes.

conclusionsCancer survivors in the telephone group evidenced better health outcomes than the Internet group. Group differences may be due to higher engagement in the telephone group. Incorporating a telephone-based component into existing weight loss programs for cancer survivors may help enhance the reach of the intervention while minimizing costs. More research is needed on how to combine Internet and telephone weight loss intervention components so as to maximize engagement and outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01311856; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01311856 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6tKdklShY).

Indexed as

cancer survivorsInternettelephoneweight loss intervention

Identifiers

PMID28954716
PMCPMC5637068
OpenAlexW2758136161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.