ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017
Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Obstetrics: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global prevalence of preeclampsia, eclampsia, and HELLP syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Remote Fetal Monitoring on Maternal-Fetal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Pooled it
- Telemedicine in Malignant and Nonmalignant Hematology: Systematic Review of Pediatric and Adult Studies.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Pooled it
- Home-Based Monitoring and Telemonitoring of Complicated Pregnancies: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Current Practice in the Netherlands.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Trial
- The impact of the pandemic on physical and functional disabilities in children and adolescents with spina bifida.Spinal cord series and cases · 2024Article
- Preventing Health Disparities during COVID through Perinatal Home Screening as Black Authoritative Knowledge.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Modeling the Likelihood of Low Birth Weight: Findings from a Chicago-Area Health System.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023Article
- Virtual clinic in pregnancy and postpartum healthcare: A systematic review.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Fetal Wellbeing Monitoring: A Review Article.Cureus · 2022Review
- Use of Facial Morphology to Determine Nutritional Status in Older Adults: Opportunities and Challenges.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2022Article
- Understanding the Needs of a Mobile Phone-Based Telemonitoring Program for Pregnant Women at High Risk for Pre-Eclampsia: Interpretive Qualitative Description Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Article
- Application of telemedicine video visits in a maternal-fetal medicine practice at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2021Article
- The effective use of telemedicine to save lives and maintain structure in a healthcare system: Current response to COVID-19.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2021Article
- Primed for a pandemic: Implementation of telehealth outpatient monitoring for women with mild COVID-19.Seminars in perinatology · 2020Article
- Challenges in Acceptance and Compliance in Digital Health Assessments During Pregnancy: Prospective Cohort Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Using mHealth in postpartum women with pre-eclampsia: Lessons learned from a qualitative study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020Article
- Exploring the Use of Telemonitoring for Patients at High Risk for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in the Antepartum and Postpartum Periods: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Women's Attitudes Toward Self-Monitoring of Their Pregnancy Using Noninvasive Electronic Devices: Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Scalable Architecture for Telemonitoring Chronic Diseases in Order to Support the CDSSs in a Common Platform.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite reported positive results of telemonitoring effectiveness in various health care domains, this new technology is rarely used in prenatal care. A few isolated investigations were performed in the past years but with conflicting results.
objectiveThe aim of this review was to (1) assess whether telemonitoring adds any substantial benefit to this patient population and (2) identify research gaps in this area to suggest goals for future research.
methodsThis review includes studies exploring the effectiveness of telemonitoring interventions for pregnant women reported in the English language. Due to the paucity of research in this area, all reports including uncontrolled nonrandomized and randomized controlled studies were selected.
resultsFourteen studies, which performed their data collection from 1988 to 2010, met the inclusion criteria and were published from 1995 to present; four of the 14 published papers were multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs), five papers were single-center RCTs, three papers were retrospective studies, one paper was an observational study, and one paper was a qualitative study. Of the 14 papers, nine were available for a risk of bias assessment: three papers were classified as low risk, one as medium risk, and five as high risk. Furthermore, of those 14 papers, 13 focused on telemonitoring for maternal outcomes, and nine of the 14 papers focused on telemonitoring for fetal or neonatal outcomes. The studies reviewed report that telemonitoring can contribute to significant reductions in health care costs, (unscheduled) face-to-face visits, low neonatal birth weight, and admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), as well as prolonged gestational age and improved feelings of maternal satisfaction when compared with a control group. When only studies with low risk of bias were taken into account, the added value of telemonitoring became less pronounced: the only added value of telemonitoring is for pregnant women who transmitted their uterine activity by telecommunication. They had significant prolonged pregnancy survivals, and the newborns were less likely to be of low birth weight or to be admitted to the NICU. Following these results, telemonitoring can only be recommended by pregnant women at risk for preterm delivery. It is however important to consider that these studies were published in the mid-90s, which limits their direct applicability given the current technologies and practice.
conclusionsThis review shows that telemonitoring can be tentatively recommended for pregnant women at risk for preterm delivery. More recent RCTs with a blinded protocol are needed to strengthen the level of evidence around this topic and to have an insight in the added value of the technologies that are available nowadays. In addition, studies investigating patient satisfaction and economic effects in relation to telemonitoring are suggested for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.