Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28954530›Full record

Trial reportChild maltreatment2017

Technology to Augment Early Home Visitation for Child Maltreatment Prevention: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.

Steven J Ondersma, Joanne Martin, Beverly Fortson, Daniel J Whitaker, Shannon Self-Brown, Jessica Beatty, Amy Loree, David Bard, Mark Chaffin

Abstract readComparative StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Child maltreatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Balancing Rigor with Complexity in Understanding the Impacts of Child Maltreatment Prevention Programs.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Steven J Ondersma1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Joanne Martin3 School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Beverly Fortson5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daniel J Whitaker5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shannon Self-Brown5 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jessica Beatty7 Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Amy Loree7 Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
David Bard9 University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Mark Chaffin9 University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

Funding

A Computer-Based Intervention to Augment Home Visitation ServicesU49CE001078 · CE · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ONDERSMA, STEVEN J. · 2006 to 2009
$1.8M
NCIPC CDC HHS U49 CE001078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early home visitation (EHV) for child maltreatment prevention is widely adopted but has received inconsistent empirical support. Supplementation with interactive software may facilitate attention to major risk factors and use of evidence-based approaches. We developed eight 20-min computer-delivered modules for use by mothers during the course of EHV. These modules were tested in a randomized trial in which 413 mothers were assigned to software-supplemented e-Parenting Program ( ePP), services as usual (SAU), or community referral conditions, with evaluation at 6 and 12 months. Outcomes included satisfaction, working alliance, EHV retention, child maltreatment, and child maltreatment risk factors. The software was well-received overall. At the 6-month follow-up, working alliance ratings were higher in the ePP condition relative to the SAU condition (Cohen's d = .36, p < .01), with no differences at 12 months. There were no between-group differences in maltreatment or major risk factors at either time point. Despite good acceptability and feasibility, these findings provide limited support for use of this software within EHV. These findings contribute to the mixed results seen across different models of EHV for child maltreatment prevention.

Indexed as

ChildChild AbuseEducation, NonprofessionalHouse CallsHumansMothersParentingTelemedicinechild maltreatmentclinical trialscommunity sampleshome visitingsubstance abuse

Identifiers

PMID28954530
PMCPMC5787857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.