Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28954284›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2017

Aggressive End-of-Life Care for Metastatic Cancer Patients Younger Than Age 65 Years.

Aaron D Falchook, Stacie B Dusetzina, Fang Tian, Ramsankar Basak, Nandini Selvam, Ronald C Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. End-of-Life Systemic Oncologic Treatment in the Immunotherapy Era: The Role of Race, Insurance, and Practice Setting.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Place of Death Among Medicaid and Commercially Insured Patients With Cancer in Washington State.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Early-onset pancreatic cancer: an institutional series evaluating end-of-life care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Aaron D FalchookDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; HealthCore, Inc., Alexandria, VA.
Stacie B DusetzinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; HealthCore, Inc., Alexandria, VA.
Fang TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; HealthCore, Inc., Alexandria, VA.
Ramsankar BasakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; HealthCore, Inc., Alexandria, VA.
Nandini SelvamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; HealthCore, Inc., Alexandria, VA.
Ronald C ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, and Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; HealthCore, Inc., Alexandria, VA.
Segeberger Kliniken · DEUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aggressive medical care at the end of life can be harmful to patients and families, but its prevalence in use among younger cancer patients is unknown. The goal of the study was to report on the use of aggressive care and hospice services for patients younger than age 65 years. Methods: Using the HealthCore Integrated Research Database, we analyzed patients who died between 2007 and 2014 with metastatic lung (n = 12 764), colorectal (n = 5207), breast (n = 5855), pancreatic (n = 3397), or prostate (n = 1508) cancer. Based on published quality measures, we assessed uses of chemotherapy, intensive care, emergency room visits, and hospice care at the end of life. We examined additional items including radiotherapy, invasive procedures, hospitalization, and in-hospital deaths. Multivariable modified Poisson regression models were used to adjust for age, sex, geographic region, rural/urban location, year of death, and regional education and income measures. Results: Across the five cancers, 10.1% to 14.1% of patients received chemotherapy within the last 14 days of life, 15.9% to 20.6% received intensive care in last 30 days, and 1.5% to 2.5% went to the emergency room two or more times in last 30 days. Hospice enrollment at least three days before death was 54.4% to 59.6%. However, 55.3% to 59.3% of patients had a hospital admission in the last 30 days, and one-third died (30.3%-35.4%) in the hospital. Conclusions: There was low use of cancer-directed treatment at the end of life for younger cancer patients, and hospice use was higher than 50%. However, there was a relatively high utilization of hospital-based care. These results demonstrate an opportunity for continued improvements in the provision of high-value, patient-centered care at the end of life.

Indexed as

Terminal CareAdultAge FactorsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHospice CareHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPopulation SurveillanceTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28954284
PMCPMC6440271
OpenAlexW2616966528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.