Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28953953›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Contaminants of emerging concern in tributaries to the Laurentian Great Lakes: II. Biological consequences of exposure.

Linnea M Thomas, Zachary G Jorgenson, Mark E Brigham, Steven J Choy, Jeremy N Moore, Jo A Banda, Daniel J Gefell, Thomas A Minarik, Heiko L Schoenfuss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Linnea M ThomasAquatic Toxicology Laboratory, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota, United States of America.
Zachary G JorgensonAquatic Toxicology Laboratory, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota, United States of America.
Mark E BrighamU.S. Geological Survey, Mounds View, Minnesota, United States of America.
Steven J ChoyU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Jeremy N MooreU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Jo A BandaU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Daniel J GefellU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cortland, New York, United States of America.
Thomas A MinarikMetropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago, Cicero, Illinois, United States of America.
Heiko L SchoenfussAquatic Toxicology Laboratory, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-992X
United States Fish and Wildlife Service · USSt. Cloud State University · USUnited States Geological Survey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Laurentian Great Lakes contain one fifth of the world's surface freshwater and have been impacted by human activity since the Industrial Revolution. In addition to legacy contaminants, nitrification and invasive species, this aquatic ecosystem is also the recipient of Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs) with poorly understood biological consequences. In the current study, we documented the presence, concentrations, and biological effects of CECs across 27 field sites in six Great Lakes tributaries by examining over 2250 resident and caged sunfish (Lepomis ssp.) for a variety of morphological and physiological endpoints and related these results to CEC occurrence. CEC were ubiquitous across studies sites and their presence and concentrations in water and sediment were highest in effluent dominated rivers and downstream of municipal wastewater treatment plant discharges. However, even putative upstream reference sites were not free of CEC presence and fish at these sites exhibited biological effects consistent with CEC exposure. Only the Fox River exhibited consistent adverse biological effects, including increased relative liver size, greater prominence of hepatocyte vacuoles and increased plasma glucose concentrations. Canonical Redundancy Analysis revealed consistent patterns of biological consequences of CEC exposure across all six tributaries. Increasing plasma glucose concentrations, likely as a result of pollutant-induced metabolic stress, were associated with increased relative liver size and greater prominence of hepatocyte vacuoles. These indicators of pollutant exposure were inversely correlated with indicators of reproductive potential including smaller gonad size and less mature gametes. The current study highlights the need for greater integration of chemical and biological studies and suggests that CECs in the Laurentian Great Lakes Basin may adversely affect the reproductive potential of exposed fish populations.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringEndpoint DeterminationEstradiolGeologic SedimentsLakesNorth AmericaWaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalEstradiolWaterWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID28953953
PMCPMC5617166
OpenAlexW2756784573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.