Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28953916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Drought and salinity induced changes in ecophysiology and proteomic profile of Parthenium hysterophorus.

Javed Ahmad, Humayra Bashir, Rita Bagheri, Affan Baig, Asma Al-Huqail, Mohamed M Ibrahim, M Irfan Qureshi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  8. Nanoparticles: The Plant Saviour under Abiotic Stresses.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The BarleyCells · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Javed AhmadDepartment of Biotechnology, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, India.
Humayra BashirDepartment of Biotechnology, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, India.
Rita BagheriDepartment of Biotechnology, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, India.
Affan BaigDepartment of Biotechnology, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, India.
Asma Al-HuqailDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Science College, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed M IbrahimDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Egypt.
M Irfan QureshiDepartment of Biotechnology, Jamia Millia Islamia (Central University), New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-0036
Department of Biotechnology · INBergen Community College · USKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parthenium hysterophorus is a plant that tolerates drought and salinity to an extremely high degree. Higher expression of stress-responsive proteome contributes for greater defence against abiotic stresses. Thus, P. hysterophorus could be a rich source of genes that encode stress-imparting mechanisms and systems. The present study utilizes comparative physiological and proteomic approaches for identification of key proteins involved in stress-defence of P. hysterophorus. Thirty-days-old plants were exposed to drought (10% PEG 6000) and salinity (160 mM NaCl) for 10 days duration. Both stresses induced oxidative stress estimated in terms of TBARS and H2O2. Levels of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants were elevated, more by drought than salinity. Particularly, SOD, GR, CAT and GST proved to be assisting as very commendable defence under drought, as well as salinity. Levels of ascorbate, glutathione and proline were also increased by both stresses, more in response to drought. Comparative proteomics analysis revealed a significant change in relative abundance of 72 proteins under drought and salinity. Drought and salinity increased abundance of 45 and 41 proteins and decreased abundance of 24 and 26 proteins, respectively. Drought and salinity increased and decreased abundance of 31 and 18 proteins, respectively. The functions of identified proteins included those related to defence response (26%), signal transduction (13%), transcription and translation (10%), growth and development (8.5%), photosynthesis (8.5%), metabolism (7%), terpenoid biosynthesis (5.5%), protein modification and transport (7%), oxido-reductase (4%) and Miscellaneous (11%). Among the defence related proteins, antioxidants and HSPs constituted 26% and 21%, respectively. Present study suggests a potential role of defence proteins. Proteins involved in molecular stabilization, formation of osmolytes and wax and contributing to stress-avoiding anatomical features emerged as key and complex mechanisms for imparting stress tolerance to P. hysterophorus.

Indexed as

DroughtsEnvironmentProteomicsSalinityAntioxidantsAsteraceaeOxidative StressPlant ProteinsAntioxidantsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28953916
PMCPMC5617186
OpenAlexW2759285740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.