Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28953676›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2017

The effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on fresh fracture: A meta-analysis.

Shenghan Lou, Houchen Lv, Zhirui Li, Licheng Zhang, Peifu Tang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07210983 (Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound as an Adjunctive Therapy for Bone Regeneration Following Jaw Cyst Enucleation With Curettage), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07210983 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound as an Adjunctive Therapy for Bone Regeneration Following Jaw Cyst Enucleation With Curettage: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSadam ElayahRan2025 to 2026Enrolled29ConditionsJaw Cysts, CurettageArmsLow-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation for Bone Fractures Healing: A Review.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shenghan LouDepartment of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, P.R. China.
Houchen Lv
Zhirui Li
Licheng Zhang
Peifu Tang
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-intensity pulsed ultrasonography (LIPUS) is a form of mechanical stimulation that is delivered via a special device to the fracture site for the acceleration of fracture healing. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effect of LIPUS for fresh fractures in adults.

methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library searched between Jan 1980 and Nov 2016. Studies should be quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with LIPUS to placebo or no treatment in adults with fresh fractures, reporting outcomes such as function; time to union; delayed union or non-union. Summary standard mean difference (SMD) and the risk ratio (RR) with their 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated with a random effects model. I statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The GRADE system was used to evaluate the evidence quality.

resultsA total of 12 trials with 1099 patients were included. The pooled results showed that LIPUS significantly reduced the time to fracture union (SMD: 0.65, 95% CI: 1.13 to 0.17), improved the quality of life (SMD: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.03-0.37) without affecting the time to full weight bearing (SMD: 0.76, 95% CI: 1.92 to 0.4), the time to return to work (SMD: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.27), or the incidence rate of delayed union and nonunion (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.60-1.74).

conclusionsModerate-to-high quality evidence shows that LIPUS treatment reduces the time to fracture union and improves the quality of life without affecting functional recovery and incident rate of delayed union and nonunion, suggesting that LIPUS treatment may be a good treatment modality for adults with fresh fractures. However, there are some methodological limitations in the eligible trials, further studies are needed to determine the clinical circumstances under which LIPUS is truly valid and to examine the optimal approach for the use of this adjunctive therapy.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeUltrasonic WavesFracture HealingFractures, BoneHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID28953676
PMCPMC5626319
OpenAlexW2758847579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.