Observational studyMedicine2017
Perception of reporting medication errors including near-misses among Korean hospital pharmacists.
Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Common Barriers to Reporting Medical Errors.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2021Pooled it
- Key performance indicators for hospital clinical pharmacy services: results of a global Delphi study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- The Financial and Workforce Impact of Medication Errors in the Finnish Public Healthcare System: A Pilot Study.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Changes in Medication Errors after Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System in a Canadian Community Hospital.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2026Article
- Medication error reporting in Ghana: A multicenter assessment of healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and practices.PloS one · 2026Article
- Investigating the prevalence of medication near-misses and reporting intention among nurses in tertiary hospitals from China.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Exploring the Use of Persuasive System Design Principles to Enhance Medication Incident Reporting and Learning Systems: Scoping Reviews and Persuasive Design Assessment.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Perceptions and Practices of Saudi Hospital Pharmacists Towards Reporting Medication Errors Including Near Misses.Cureus · 2024Article
- A nationwide assessment of community pharmacists' attitudes towards dispensing errors: A cross-sectional study.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2022Article
- Knowledge and Attitude toward Medication Error among Pharmacists.Hospital pharmacy · 2021Article
- Medication Errors in Secondary Care Hospitals in Kuwait: The Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- A drug identification model developed using deep learning technologies: experience of a medical center in Taiwan.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medication errors threaten patient safety by requiring admission, readmission, and/or a longer hospital stay, and can even be fatal. Near-misses indicate the potential for medication errors to have occurred. Therefore, reporting near-misses is a first step in preventing medication errors. The aim of this study was to estimate the reporting rate of near-misses among pharmacists in Korean hospitals, and to identify the factors that contributed to reporting medication errors.We surveyed 245 pharmacists from 32 hospital pharmacies for medication errors, including near-misses. We asked them to describe their experiences of near-misses in dispensing, administration, and prescribing, and to indicate the percentage of near-misses that they reported. Additionally, we asked questions related to the perception of medication errors and barriers to reporting medication errors. These questions were grouped into 4 categories: protocol and methods of reporting, incentives and protections for reporters, attitude related to reporting, and fear. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were conducted to analyze the data.Five or more near-misses per month were experienced by 14.8%, 4.3%, and 43.9% of respondents for dispensing, administration, and prescribing errors, respectively. The percentages of respondents who stated that they reported all near-misses involving dispensing errors, administration errors, and prescribing errors were 43.7%, 57.4%, and 37.1%, respectively. Unclear reporting protocols and the absence of harm done to patients were significant factors contributing to the failure to report medication errors (P < .05).Advances can still be made in the frequency of reporting near-misses. Clear and standardized policies and procedures are likely to increase the reporting rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.