Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28953325›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2017

Multicentre analysis of second-line antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected children: adolescents at high risk of failure.

Ragna S Boerma, Torsak Bunupuradah, Dorothy Dow, Joseph Fokam, Azar Kariminia, Dara Lehman, Cissy Kityo, Victor Musiime, Paul Palumbo, Annelot Schoffelen and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ragna S BoermaAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Torsak BunupuradahHIV-NAT, The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dorothy DowDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Joseph FokamChantal BIYA International Reference Centre for Research on HIV/AIDS Prevention and Management, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Azar KariminiaThe Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Dara LehmanDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and the Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cissy KityoJoint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda.
Victor MusiimeJoint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul PalumboSection of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Annelot SchoffelenDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sam SophanChild Health Improvement Clinic, Department of HIV/AIDS-TB, National Pediatric Hospital, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Brian ZanoniMassachusetts General Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston, MA, USA.
Tobias F Rinke de WitAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Job C J CalisGlobal Child Health Group, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kim C E SigaloffAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development and Department of Global Health, Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paediatric Second-line Study Group

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGIA Doris TOMARAS · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
The Asia-Pacific HIV Research CollaborationU01AI069907 · NIAID · FOUNDATION FOR AIDS RESEARCH · PI ANNETTE H SOHN · 2006 to 2026
$44.8M
Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterKL2TR001100 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$8.5M
Integrating Mental Health into a HIV Clinic to Improve Outcomes in Tanzanian YouthK01TW009985 · FIC · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DOW, DOROTHY E. · 2015 to 2019
$667k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW009985NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001100NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI069907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe number of HIV-infected children and adolescents requiring second-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). However, the effectiveness of paediatric second-line ART and potential risk factors for virologic failure are poorly characterized. We performed an aggregate analysis of second-line ART outcomes for children and assessed the need for paediatric third-line ART.

methodsWe performed a multicentre analysis by systematically reviewing the literature to identify cohorts of children and adolescents receiving second-line ART in LMIC, contacting the corresponding study groups and including patient-level data on virologic and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to describe cumulative rates and predictors of virologic failure. Virologic failure was defined as two consecutive viral load measurements >1000 copies/ml after at least six months of second-line treatment.

resultsWe included 12 cohorts representing 928 children on second-line protease inhibitor (PI)-based ART in 14 countries in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. After 24 months, 16.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.9-19.4) of children experienced virologic failure. Adolescents (10-18 years) had failure rates of 14.5 (95% CI 11.9-17.6) per 100 person-years compared to 4.5 (95% CI 3.4-5.8) for younger children (3-9 years). Risk factors for virologic failure were adolescence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.93,

conclusionsIn LMIC, paediatric PI-based second-line ART was associated with relatively low virologic failure rates. However, adolescents showed exceptionally poor virologic outcomes in LMIC, and optimizing their HIV care requires urgent attention. In addition, 16% of children and adolescents failed PI-based treatment and will require integrase inhibitors to construct salvage regimens. These drugs are currently not available in LMIC.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnti-HIV AgentsAsiaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMalePovertyRisk FactorsTreatment FailureViral LoadAnti-HIV Agentsadolescentsantiretroviral treatmentchildrenHIV-1second-line treatmentvirologic failure

Identifiers

PMID28953325
PMCPMC5640308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.