Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28953071›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational and environmental medicine2018

Applying Machine Learning to Workers' Compensation Data to Identify Industry-Specific Ergonomic and Safety Prevention Priorities: Ohio, 2001 to 2011.

Alysha R Meyers, Ibraheem S Al-Tarawneh, Steven J Wurzelbacher, P Timothy Bushnell, Michael P Lampl, Jennifer L Bell, Stephen J Bertke, David C Robins, Chih-Yu Tseng, Chia Wei and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Establishment-level occupational safety analytics: Challenges and opportunities.International journal of industrial ergonomics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alysha R MeyersNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, Center for Workers' Compensation Studies, Cincinnati, Ohio (Drs Meyers, Wurzelbacher, Ms Tseng); Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Division of Safety and Hygiene, Pickerington, Ohio (Dr Al-Tarawneh, Mr Lampl, Mr Robins); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Office of the Director, Economic Research Support Office, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Bushnell); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Safety Research, Morgantown, West Virginia (Dr Bell); National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Bertke, Ms Raudabaugh, Dr Schnorr); Taiwan Centers for Disease Control, Taipei City, Taiwan (Dr Wei).
Ibraheem S Al-Tarawneh
Steven J Wurzelbacher
P Timothy Bushnell
Michael P Lampl
Jennifer L Bell
Stephen J Bertke
David C Robins
Chih-Yu Tseng
Chia Wei
Jill A Raudabaugh
Teresa M Schnorr

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study leveraged a state workers' compensation claims database and machine learning techniques to target prevention efforts by injury causation and industry.

methodsInjury causation auto-coding methods were developed to code more than 1.2 million Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation claims for this study. Industry groups were ranked for soft-tissue musculoskeletal claims that may have been preventable with biomechanical ergonomic (ERGO) or slip/trip/fall (STF) interventions.

resultsOn the basis of the average of claim count and rate ranks for more than 200 industry groups, Skilled Nursing Facilities (ERGO) and General Freight Trucking (STF) were the highest risk for lost-time claims (>7 days).

conclusionThis study created a third, major causation-specific U.S. occupational injury surveillance system. These findings are being used to focus prevention resources on specific occupational injury types in specific industry groups, especially in Ohio. Other state bureaus or insurers may use similar methods.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSafetyErgonomicsHumansIndustryMusculoskeletal DiseasesOccupational DiseasesOccupational HealthOccupational InjuriesOhioWorkers' Compensation

Identifiers

PMID28953071
PMCPMC5868484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.