Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28952569›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2016

DNA and RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR-Based Assays for Biogas Biocenoses in an Interlaboratory Comparison.

Michael Lebuhn, Jaqueline Derenkó, Antje Rademacher, Susanne Helbig, Bernhard Munk, Alexander Pechtl, Yvonne Stolze, Steffen Prowe, Wolfgang H Schwarz, Andreas Schlüter and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Evaluation of Alternative Transport Media for RT-qPCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Testing.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Michael LebuhnBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Department for Quality Assurance and Analytics, Lange Point 6, 85354 Freising, Germany. michael.lebuhn@lfl.bayern.de.
Jaqueline DerenkóLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam-Bornim, Department Bioengineering, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany. jderenko@atb-potsdam.de.
Antje RademacherLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam-Bornim, Department Bioengineering, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany. arademacher@atb-potsdam.de.
Susanne HelbigBeuth University of Applied Sciences, Department of Life Sciences and Technology, Luxemburger Strasse 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany. shelbig@beuth-hochschule.de.
Bernhard MunkBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Department for Quality Assurance and Analytics, Lange Point 6, 85354 Freising, Germany. Bernhard.Munk@lfl.bayern.de.
Alexander PechtlDepartment of Microbiology, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, D-85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany. alexander.pechtl@tum.de.
Yvonne StolzeInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. ystolze@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de.
Steffen ProweBeuth University of Applied Sciences, Department of Life Sciences and Technology, Luxemburger Strasse 10, 13353 Berlin, Germany. steffen.prowe@beuth-hochschule.de.
Wolfgang H SchwarzDepartment of Microbiology, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, D-85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany. wschwarz@wzw.tum.de.
Andreas SchlüterInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. aschluet@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de.
Wolfgang LieblDepartment of Microbiology, Technische Universität München, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4, D-85354 Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany. wliebl@mytum.de.
Michael KlockeLeibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering Potsdam-Bornim, Department Bioengineering, Max-Eyth-Allee 100, 14469 Potsdam, Germany. mklocke@atb-potsdam.de.
Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy · DETechnical University of Munich · DEBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture · DEBerliner Hochschule für Technik · DEBielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Five institutional partners participated in an interlaboratory comparison of nucleic acid extraction, RNA preservation and quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) based assays for biogas biocenoses derived from different grass silage digesting laboratory and pilot scale fermenters. A kit format DNA extraction system based on physical and chemical lysis with excellent extraction efficiency yielded highly reproducible results among the partners and clearly outperformed a traditional CTAB/chloroform/isoamylalcohol based method. Analytical purpose, sample texture, consistency and upstream pretreatment steps determine the modifications that should be applied to achieve maximum efficiency in the trade-off between extract purity and nucleic acid recovery rate. RNA extraction was much more variable, and the destination of the extract determines the method to be used. RNA stabilization with quaternary ammonium salts was an as satisfactory approach as flash freezing in liquid N₂. Due to co-eluted impurities, spectrophotometry proved to be of limited value for nucleic acid qualification and quantification in extracts obtained with the kit, and picoGreen

Indexed as

absolute quantificationBacteriaDNA purityextraction efficiencyfermenter sludgemethanogensPCR suitabilityreverse transcriptionring-trialRNA preservation

Identifiers

PMID28952569
PMCPMC5597165
OpenAlexW2233045629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.