ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2017
Microdevice Platform for In Vitro Nervous System and Its Disease Model.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prion and "Prion-Like" Detection: From Conventional Methods to Microfluidics or Lab-on-Chip Platforms to Monitor Seeding and Spreading of Misfolded Proteins.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Organs-on-Chips Platforms Are Everywhere: A Zoom on Biomedical Investigation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Modeling Neurodegenerative Diseases UsingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Bioengineered microfluidic blood-brain barrier models in oncology research.Translational oncology · 2021Review
- Organ-on-a-chip: recent breakthroughs and future prospects.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Review
- In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier-Integrated Neurological Disorder Models Using a Microfluidic Device.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Advances in ex vivo models and lab-on-a-chip devices for neural tissue engineering.Biomaterials · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of precise microdevices can be applied to the reconstruction of in vitro human microenvironmental systems with biomimetic physiological conditions that have highly tunable spatial and temporal features. Organ-on-a-chip can emulate human physiological functions, particularly at the organ level, as well as its specific roles in the body. Due to the complexity of the structure of the central nervous system and its intercellular interaction, there remains an urgent need for the development of human brain or nervous system models. Thus, various microdevice models have been proposed to mimic actual human brain physiology, which can be categorized as nervous system-on-a-chip. Nervous system-on-a-chip platforms can prove to be promising technologies, through the application of their biomimetic features to the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases. This article reviews the microdevices for nervous system-on-a-chip platform incorporated with neurobiology and microtechnology, including microfluidic designs that are biomimetic to the entire nervous system. The emulation of both neurodegenerative disorders and neural stem cell behavior patterns in micro-platforms is also provided, which can be used as a basis to construct nervous system-on-a-chip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.