Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28952532›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Production of Polyhydroxyalkanoates Using Hydrolyzates of Spruce Sawdust: Comparison of Hydrolyzates Detoxification by Application of Overliming, Active Carbon, and Lignite.

Dan Kucera, Pavla Benesova, Peter Ladicky, Miloslav Pekar, Petr Sedlacek, Stanislav Obruca

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A Review on EnhancingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Quorum Sensing Controls Both Rhamnolipid and Polyhydroxyalkanoate Production inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Advances in Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) Production.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dan KuceraFaculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic. Dan.Kucera@vut.cz.
Pavla BenesovaFaculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic. pavla.benesova@vut.cz.
Peter LadickyFaculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic. peter.ladicky@vut.cz.
Miloslav PekarFaculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic. pekar@fch.vut.cz.ORCID 0000-0002-3878-0917
Petr SedlacekFaculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic. sedlacek-p@fch.vut.cz.
Stanislav ObrucaFaculty of Chemistry, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 118, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic. obruca@fch.vut.cz.
Brno University of Technology · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) are bacterial polyesters which are considered biodegradable alternatives to petrochemical plastics. PHAs have a wide range of potential applications, however, the production cost of this bioplastic is several times higher. A major percentage of the final cost is represented by the price of the carbon source used in the fermentation.

Indexed as

Burkholderiadetoxificationlignitepolyhydroxyalkanoates

Identifiers

PMID28952532
PMCPMC5590457
OpenAlexW2616888054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.