Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28952518›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2017

The Role of Microfluidics for Organ on Chip Simulations.

Aziz Ur Rehman Aziz, Chunyang Geng, Mengjie Fu, Xiaohui Yu, Kairong Qin, Bo Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Fabrication and Characterization Techniques of In Vitro 3D Tissue Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Polymeric nanoparticles as therapeutic agents against coronavirus disease.Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology · 2022
    Review
  17. The Progress of Intestinal Epithelial Models from Cell Lines to Gut-On-Chip.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Microphysiological Systems: Design, Fabrication, and Applications.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aziz Ur Rehman AzizDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China. azizjatoi@hotmail.com.
Chunyang GengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China. 1352257919@mail.dlut.edu.cn.
Mengjie FuDalian Institute of Maternal and Child Health Care. Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China. fmjnewlife@126.com.
Xiaohui YuDalian Institute of Maternal and Child Health Care. Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China. yuxiaohui369@163.com.
Kairong QinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China. krqin@dlut.edu.cn.
Bo LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning Province, China. lbo@dlut.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multichannel three-dimensional chip of a microfluidic cell culture which enables the simulation of organs is called an "organ on a chip" (OC). With the integration of many other technologies, OCs have been mimicking organs, substituting animal models, and diminishing the time and cost of experiments which is better than the preceding conventional in vitro models, which make them imperative tools for finding functional properties, pathological states, and developmental studies of organs. In this review, recent progress regarding microfluidic devices and their applications in cell cultures is discussed to explain the advantages and limitations of these systems. Microfluidics is not a solution but only an approach to create a controlled environment, however, other supporting technologies are needed, depending upon what is intended to be achieved. Microfluidic platforms can be integrated with additional technologies to enhance the organ on chip simulations. Besides, new directions and areas are mentioned for interested researchers in this field, and future challenges regarding the simulation of OCs are also discussed, which will make microfluidics more accurate and beneficial for biological applications.

Indexed as

3D biopringtingBioengineeringBiosensorsMicrobiomeMicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID28952518
PMCPMC5590458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.