Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28952055›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2017

Analysis of selected fungi variation and its dependence on season and mountain range in southern Poland-key factors in drawing up trial guidelines for aeromycological monitoring.

Wojciech Pusz, Ryszard Weber, Andrzej Dancewicz, Włodzimierz Kita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Airborne fungi in Longyearbyen area (Svalbard, Norway) - case study.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wojciech PuszDepartment of Plant Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 24A, 50-363, Wroclaw, Poland. wojciech.pusz@upwr.edu.pl.
Ryszard WeberInstitute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-National Research Institute, ul. Orzechowa 62, 50-540, Wroclaw, Poland.
Andrzej DancewiczInstitute of Meteorology and Water Managemen-National Research Institute, ul. Parkowa 30, 56-616, Wroclaw, Poland.
Włodzimierz KitaDepartment of Plant Protection, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Plac Grunwaldzki 24A, 50-363, Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify fungal spores, in particular plant pathogenic fungi, occurring in the air in selected mountain ranges. The results revealed not only the array of fungal species migrating with air currents from the Czech Republic and Slovakia but also how the season of the year affects the distribution of spores. Such studies may lay a foundation for future aeromycological monitoring, in accordance with the requirements for integrated plant protection. Aeromycological research was carried out between 2013 and 2016 at 3-month intervals in mountainous areas along the southern borders of Poland: the Bieszczady, the Pieniny, the Giant Mountains (Karkonosze) and the Babia Góra Massif. The research relied on impact method employing Air Ideal 3P sampler, which, by drawing in atmospheric air, also collects fungal spores. Regardless of altitudinal zonation, the changing weather conditions appeared to be the main reason for the variations in the number of the fungal spores under study in those years.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyCzech RepublicEnvironmental MonitoringFungiGuidelines as TopicPlantsPolandSeasonsSlovakiaSpores, FungalWeatherAeromycological monitoringFungal diseasesPathogenic fungiStatistical methods

Identifiers

PMID28952055
PMCPMC5614908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.