Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28952037›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018

Intravascular ultrasound assessment of the effect of laser energy on the arterial wall during the treatment of femoro-popliteal lesions: a CliRpath excimer laser system to enlarge lumen openings (CELLO) registry study.

Kayode O Kuku, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, Edward Koifman, Alexandre H Kajita, Sameer Desale, Viana Azizi, Gebremedhin Melaku, Anh Bui, Yael F Meirovich, Solomon Beyene and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cardiovascular imaging 2018 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kayode O KukuMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Hector M Garcia-GarciaMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA. hector.m.garciagarcia@medstar.net.
Edward KoifmanMedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Alexandre H KajitaMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Sameer DesaleMedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, MD, USA.
Viana AziziMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Gebremedhin MelakuMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Anh BuiMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Yael F MeirovichMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Solomon BeyeneMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Aaphtaab DheendsaMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Blaine SchneiderSpectranetics Corporation, Maple Grove, Minnesota, USA.
Ron WaksmanMedStar Cardiovascular Research Network, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
CELLO study investigators
MedStar Washington Hospital Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CliRpath Excimer Laser System to Enlarge Lumen Openings (CELLO) registry included patients treated with modified excimer laser catheters for the endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease affecting the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and proximal popliteal artery. The aim of this study was to assess, via intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) the dissections in the vessel wall following treatment with the laser catheters. IVUS grayscale images from the CELLO registry were systematically reviewed for dissections in the treated vessel segments by two investigators. Images from 33 patients; 66 pullbacks (1867 IVUS frames in 2 phases), were successfully matched frame-to-frame to evaluate identical segments of the treated vessels in the two phases; post-2 mm Turbo-Elite laser pilot channel creation and post Turbo-Booster laser atherectomy. Dissections were categorized as; (1) intimal, (2) medial, (3) intramural hematoma, and (4) adventitial according to the ACC Clinical Expert Consensus Document classification of dissections. An average of 57 frames was evaluated per pullback, giving a total of 3734 frames (1867 matched for pre-ablation (post channel creation) and post-ablation phases). Treatments with the modified Excimer laser catheters resulted in a significant increase in lumen area of 5.5 ± 3.2-mm

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, InterventionalAgedAtherectomyEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFemoral ArteryHematomaHumansLasers, ExcimerMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseasePlaque, AtheroscleroticPopliteal ArteryPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesDissectionsExcimer laser atherectomyFemoro-poplitealIntravascular ultrasoundPeripheral arterial disease

Identifiers

PMID28952037
PMCPMC5847219
OpenAlexW2760436858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.