Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28951958›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

Ocular anatomic changes for different accommodative demands using swept-source optical coherence tomography: a pilot study.

José J Esteve-Taboada, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Miguel A Aloy, José E Adsuara, Pablo Cerdá-Durán, Petar Mimica, Robert Montés-Micó

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

José J Esteve-TaboadaDepartment of Optics and Optometry and Visual Science, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, Burjassot, 46100, Spain. josejuan.esteve@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8663-6373
Teresa Ferrer-BlascoDepartment of Optics and Optometry and Visual Science, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, Burjassot, 46100, Spain.
Miguel A AloyDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, Burjassot, 46100, Spain.
José E AdsuaraDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, Burjassot, 46100, Spain.
Pablo Cerdá-DuránDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, Burjassot, 46100, Spain.
Petar MimicaDepartment of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, Burjassot, 46100, Spain.
Robert Montés-MicóDepartment of Optics and Optometry and Visual Science, University of Valencia, C/ Dr Moliner, 50, Burjassot, 46100, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (ES) SAF2013-49284-EXP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of our study was to assess the changes in ocular parameters for different accommodative demands using a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT).

methodsSeven subjects were included in this pilot study, and only one eye per participant was analyzed. Each eye was measured six times with the optical biometer IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). As this instrument is not able to change the vergence of the stimulus, to enable measurements at different accommodative states, a tilted first-surface mirror attached to the optical biometer was used to place the fixation stimulus at different vergences. Measurements were taken on the right eye of the subject while the left eye was looking through the mirror. Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), axial length (AL), white-to-white (WTW) distance and keratometric readings were evaluated for three different accommodative states: 0.0 diopters (D), 1.5 D, and 3.0 D.

resultsNo statistically significant differences were found for CCT, AL, WTW, K1 and K2 between the three accommodative states. As expected, changing the accommodative condition did not change CCT, AL, WTW, and keratometric outcomes. Nevertheless, statistically significant differences between the accommodative states were found for ACD and LT measurements. In addition, variations in ACD correlated linearly with variations in LT (R

conclusionA practical methodology to assess the changes in ocular parameters for different accommodative demands using the IOLMaster 700 based on SS-OCT has been described. Statistically significant changes that have been found that agree well with previous reports.

Indexed as

Accommodation, OcularAdultAnterior ChamberAxial Length, EyeFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical CoherenceAccommodationAnterior chamberOptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.