Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28951722›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2017

The Unfolded Protein Response in Amelogenesis and Enamel Pathologies.

Steven J Brookes, Martin J Barron, Michael J Dixon, Jennifer Kirkham

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The phosphorylation of serineMatrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mechanisms Targeting the Unfolded Protein Response in Asthma.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Steven J BrookesDivision of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, St James's University HospitalLeeds, United Kingdom.
Martin J BarronFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of ManchesterManchester, United Kingdom.
Michael J DixonFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of ManchesterManchester, United Kingdom.
Jennifer KirkhamDivision of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, St James's University HospitalLeeds, United Kingdom.
St James's University Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 075945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the secretory phase of their life-cycle, ameloblasts are highly specialized secretory cells whose role is to elaborate an extracellular matrix that ultimately confers both form and function to dental enamel, the most highly mineralized of all mammalian tissues. In common with many other "professional" secretory cells, ameloblasts employ the unfolded protein response (UPR) to help them cope with the large secretory cargo of extracellular matrix proteins transiting their ER (endoplasmic reticulum)/Golgi complex and so minimize ER stress. However, the UPR is a double-edged sword, and, in cases where ER stress is severe and prolonged, the UPR switches from pro-survival to pro-apoptotic mode. The purpose of this review is to consider the role of the ameloblast UPR in the biology and pathology of amelogenesis; specifically in respect of amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) and fluorosis. Some forms of AI appear to correspond to classic proteopathies, where pathological intra-cellular accumulations of protein tip the UPR toward apoptosis. Fluorosis also involves the UPR and, while not of itself a classic proteopathic disease, shares some common elements through the involvement of the UPR. The possibility of therapeutic intervention by pharmacological modulation of the UPR in AI and fluorosis is also discussed.

Indexed as

ameloblastamelogenesis imperfectaapoptosisER stressfluorosisunfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID28951722
PMCPMC5599773
OpenAlexW2754893692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.