Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28951699›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Does intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alter prostate size? Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients undergoing IMRT alone.

Hidekazu Tanaka, Takahiro Yamaguchi, Kae Hachiya, Masahide Hayashi, Shinichi Ogawa, Hironori Nishibori, Shingo Kamei, Satoshi Ishihara, Masayuki Matsuo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hidekazu TanakaDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Takahiro YamaguchiDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Kae HachiyaDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Masahide HayashiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Shimokobi 590, Kobicho, Minokamo 505-8503, Japan.
Shinichi OgawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Shimokobi 590, Kobicho, Minokamo 505-8503, Japan.
Hironori NishiboriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Shimokobi 590, Kobicho, Minokamo 505-8503, Japan.
Shingo KameiDepartment of Urology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Shimokobi 590, Kobicho, Minokamo 505-8503, Japan.
Satoshi IshiharaDepartment of Urology, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Shimokobi 590, Kobicho, Minokamo 505-8503, Japan.
Masayuki MatsuoDepartment of Radiology, Gifu University, Yanagido 1-1, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Aizawa Hospital · JPGifu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the changes in prostate size in patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

backgroundThe effect of size change produced by IMRT is not well known. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe enrolled 72 patients who received IMRT alone without androgen-deprivation therapy and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination before and after IMRT. The diameter of the entire prostate in the anterior-posterior (P-AP) and left-right (P-LR) directions was measured. The transitional zone diameter in the anterior-posterior (T-AP) and left-right (T-LR) directions was also measured.

resultsThe average relative P-AP values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after IMRT compared to the pre-IMRT value were 0.94, 0.90, 0.89, 0.89, and 0.90, respectively; the average relative P-LR values were 0.93, 0.92, 0.91, 0.91, and 0.90, respectively. The average P-AP and P-LR decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months post-IMRT, and remained unchanged thereafter. The average relative T-AP values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after IMRT compared to the pre-IMRT value were 0.93, 0.88, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively; the average relative T-LR values were 0.96, 0.90, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.88, respectively. The average T-AP and T-LR also decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months post-IMRT, and remained unchanged thereafter. At 12 months after IMRT, the average relative T-AP was significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those without recurrence.

conclusionsThe average prostate diameter decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months after IMRT; thereafter remained unchanged.

Indexed as

External beam radiation therapyIntensity-modulated radiation therapyMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28951699
PMCPMC5607145
OpenAlexW2756275110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.