Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28951574›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Determining the biomechanics of touch sensation in C. elegans.

Muna Elmi, Vijay M Pawar, Michael Shaw, David Wong, Haoyun Zhan, Mandayam A Srinivasan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drop-Shaped Optical Microfiber Enabled Biomechanical Sensor.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. The influence of internal pressure and neuromuscular agents onFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HowGenetics · 2019
    Review
  10. The tactile receptive fields of freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Muna ElmiUCL TouchLab, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. muna.elmi@ucl.ac.uk.
Vijay M PawarUCL TouchLab, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Michael ShawUCL TouchLab, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
David WongUCL TouchLab, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Haoyun ZhanUCL TouchLab, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
Mandayam A SrinivasanUCL TouchLab, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
University College London · GBMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USNational Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sense of touch is a fundamental mechanism that nearly all organisms use to interact with their surroundings. However, the process of mechanotransduction whereby a mechanical stimulus gives rise to a neuronal response is not well understood. In this paper we present an investigation of the biomechanics of touch using the model organism C. elegans. By developing a custom micromanipulation and force sensing system around a high resolution optical microscope, we measured the spatial deformation of the organism's cuticle and force response to controlled uniaxial indentations. We combined these experimental results with anatomical data to create a multilayer computational biomechanical model of the organism and accurately derive its material properties such as the elastic modulus and poisson's ratio. We demonstrate the utility of this model by combining it with previously published electrophysiological data to provide quantitative insights into different biomechanical states for mechanotransduction, including the first estimate of the sensitivity of an individual mechanoreceptor to an applied stimulus (parameterised as strain energy density). We also interpret empirical behavioural data to estimate the minimum number of mechanoreceptors which must be activated to elicit a behavioural response.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCaenorhabditis elegansComputer SimulationMechanoreceptorsMechanotransduction, CellularTouch

Identifiers

PMID28951574
PMCPMC5615042
OpenAlexW2756441908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.