ArticleBMJ quality & safety2018
Interprofessional collaboration among care professionals in obstetrical care: are perceptions aligned?
Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interprofessional collaboration is critical for woman-centred SRMNAH services.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Competency Goals in Midwifery Master's Programs in Germany and Selected OECD Countries: Comparison of Stakeholder Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Strengthening community-based doula and clinician partnerships through implementation and dissemination science approaches: a mixed-methods pilot study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- A balancing act: Primary care midwives screening for fetal growth restriction- a focus group study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Interprofessional Collaboration in Obstetric and Midwifery Care-Multigroup Comparison of Midwives' and Physicians' Perspective.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unpacking the black box of interprofessional collaboration within healthcare networks: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Interprofessional perspectives on non-invasive respiratory support practices in extremely preterm infants: a Canadian survey.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- "Nothing Comes to Mind…": Challenges With Identifying One's Own Role in Preventable Adverse Outcomes in Interprofessional Birthing Unit Teams, and the Implications for Quality Improvement Initiatives.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
- Strategies to Sustain Interprofessional Collaboration in Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care in Rwanda: Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Hospital Managers.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2024Article
- Integrated maternity care: A concept analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Evaluation of an infection control link nurse program: an analysis using the RE-AIM framework.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Assessment of interprofessional obstetric and midwifery care from the midwives' perspective using the Interprofessional Collaboration Scale (ICS).Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Does interprofessional team-training affect nurses' and physicians' perceptions of safety culture and communication practices? Results of a pre-post survey study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Continuous Support Promotes Obstetric Labor Progress and Vaginal Delivery in Primiparous Women - A Randomized Controlled Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Attitude of nurses and midwives towards collaborative care with physicians in Jimma University medical center, Jimma, South West Ethiopia.Human resources for health · 2020Article
- Patient safety in chiropractic teaching programs: a mixed methods study.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2020Article
- Article
- Twelve tips on how to motivate healthcare professions students and their supervisors for Interprofessional Education.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2020Article
- Lack of focus on nutrition and documentation in nursing homes, home care- and home nursing: the self-perceived views of the primary care workforce.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- How good is collaboration between maternity service providers in the Netherlands?Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn an obstetrical team, obstetricians, midwives and nurses work together in a dynamic and complex care setting. Different professional cultures can be a barrier for effective interprofessional collaboration. Although the different professional cultures in obstetrical care are well known, little is understood about discrepancies in mutual perceptions of collaboration. Similar perceptions of collaboration are important to ensure patient safety. We aimed to understand how different care professionals in an obstetrical team assess interprofessional collaboration in order to gain insight into the extent to which their perceptions are aligned.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was performed in the north-western region of the Netherlands. Care professionals from five hospitals and surrounding primary-care midwifery practices were surveyed. The respondents consisted of four groups of care professionals: obstetricians (n=74), hospital-based midwives known as clinical midwives (n=42), nurses (n=154) and primary-care midwives (n=109). The overall response rate was 80.8%. We used the Interprofessional Collaboration Measurement Scale (IPCMS) to assess perceived interprofessional collaboration. The IPCMS distinguishes three subscales: communication, accommodation and isolation. Data were analysed using non-parametrical tests.
resultsOverall, ratings of interprofessional collaboration were good. Obstetricians rated their collaboration with clinical midwives, nurses and primary-care midwives more positively than these three groups rated the collaboration with obstetricians. Discrepancies in mutual perceptions were most apparent in the isolation subscale, which is about sharing opinions, discussing new practices and respecting each other.
conclusionWe found relevant discrepancies in mutual perceptions of collaboration in obstetrical care in the Netherlands. Obstetrical care is currently being reorganised to enable more integrated care, which will have consequences for interprofessional collaboration. The findings of this study indicate opportunities for improvement especially in terms of perceived isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.