ArticleThe oncologist2018
Predictors of Venous Thromboembolism and Early Mortality in Lung Cancer: Results from a Global Prospective Study (CANTARISK).
Article in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and risk factors of VTE in lung cancer: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of risk prediction model of venous thromboembolism for patients with lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Lung cancer mortality and associated predictors: systematic review using 32 scientific research findings.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of the relationship between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C polymorphism and venous thromboembolism in the Caucasian and Asian.Bioscience reports · 2020Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The Khorana score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Haematologica · 2019Pooled it
- Construction and verification of a nomogram to predict the probability of venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Thromboembolism in Elderly Patients With Stage IV Lung Cancer.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism post-VATS in simultaneous multicentric primary lung cancers.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Incidence of pulmonary embolism and its risk factors in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- The Association of Khorana Risk Score with Venous Thromboembolism and Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Assessing venous thromboembolism risk in lung cancer: a comprehensive evaluation of the khorana score, clinical characteristics, and incidence of thrombosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- External Validation of Risk Scores for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism in Ambulatory Patients with Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- DNA liquid biopsy-based prediction of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- The early and long-term occurrence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after lung cancer surgery without extended thromboprophylaxis-a single center experience with 435 patients.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Article
- Plasma tissue factor activity in lung cancer patients predicts venous thromboembolism and poor overall survival.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Review
- Application of IMB model in preventing venous thromboembolism in elderly lung cancer patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with lung cancer are known to be at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Venous thromboembolism is associated with increased risk for early mortality. However, there have been no studies performing a comprehensive assessment of risk factors for VTE or early mortality in lung cancer patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy in a global real-world setting. MATERIALS AND
methodsCANTARISK is a prospective, global, noninterventional cohort study including patients with lung cancer initiating a new cancer therapy. Clinical data were collected until 6-month follow-up. The impact of patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors on the occurrence of VTE and early mortality was evaluated in univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. A previously validated VTE risk score (VTE-RS) was also calculated (also known as Khorana score).
resultsOf 1,980 patients with lung cancer who were enrolled from 2011 to 2012, 84% had non-small cell lung cancer. During the first 6 months, 121 patients developed a VTE (6.1%), of which 47% had pulmonary embolism, 46% deep vein thrombosis, 3% catheter-associated thrombosis, and 4% visceral thrombosis. Independent predictors for VTE included female sex, North America location, leg immobilization, and presence of a central venous catheter. The VTE-RS was not significantly associated with VTE in either univariable or multivariable analysis in this population. During the study period, 472 patients died, representing 20%, 24%, 36%, and 25% with VTE-RS 1, 2, ≥3, or unknown, respectively (
conclusionIn this global, prospective, real-world analysis, several demographic, geographic, and clinical factors are independent risk factors for VTE and early mortality in patients with lung cancer. The VTE-RS represents a significant independent predictor of early mortality but not for VTE in lung cancer in the era of targeted therapy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Multiple risk factors for both venous thromboembolism (VTE) and early mortality in patients with lung cancer receiving systemic chemotherapy should guide best practice by better informing clinical evaluation and treatment decision-making. The Khorana risk score is of value in assessing the risk of early all-cause mortality along with other clinical parameters in patients with lung cancer receiving systemic therapy. Further study is needed to fully evaluate the validity of the risk score in predicting the risk of VTE in the modern era of lung cancer therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.