Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28951407›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Association between mothers' screening uptake and daughters' HPV vaccination: a quasi-experimental study on the effect of an active invitation campaign.

Francesco Venturelli, Flavia Baldacchini, Cinzia Campari, Cinzia Perilli, Maria Grazia Pascucci, Alba Carola Finarelli, Luigi Moscara, Paolo Giorgi Rossi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Increasing HPV Vaccination Uptake among Adolescents: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco VenturelliInterinstitutional Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9190-8668
Flavia BaldacchiniRomagna Cancer Registry, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST)-IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Cinzia CampariArcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cinzia PerilliPublic Health Service, Local Health Authority of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Maria Grazia PascucciDirectorate General for Health and Social Policy - Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy.
Alba Carola FinarelliDirectorate General for Health and Social Policy - Emilia-Romagna Region, Bologna, Italy.
Luigi MoscaraCommunity paediatrics, Local Health Authority of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Paolo Giorgi RossiInterinstitutional Epidemiology Unit, Local Health Authority of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Azienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITAgenzia Sanitaria e Sociale Regionale · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn Emilia-Romagna, the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination campaign started in 2008 offering free vaccines for 1996 and 1997 cohorts. Systematic active invitation was implemented for the 1997 cohort. Our study aimed at measuring the impact of the active invitation campaign on HPV vaccine coverage and on coverage inequalities in 11-year-old girls. Second, we evaluated the effect of the HPV vaccination campaign on participation in cervical cancer screening by mothers of target girls.

methodsWe collected information on vaccination status for girls residing in Reggio Emilia in 2008 and mothers' screening history, before and after the 2008 vaccination campaign. Log-binomial regression models were performed to estimate Relative Risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of being vaccinated as regarded citizenship, siblings, mothers' education, marital status and screening history, stratified by birth cohort. We also calculated RR of receiving a Pap test after the vaccination campaign as regarded education, daughter's cohort and mothers' decision to have their daughter vaccinated. Interaction between education and cohort in mothers overdue for Pap testing was calculated.

resultsVaccination coverage was 46.3% for the uninvited cohort (1046/2260) and 77.9% for the invited cohort (1798/2307). In the uninvited cohort, daughters' vaccination showed association with mothers' education (8 to 11 years of education vs. graduated mothers, RR 1.61 95% CI 1.14-2.28), citizenship (foreigners vs. Italians, RR 0.45 95% CI 0.37-0.56) and screening history (regular vs. non-participant; RR 1.72 95% CI 1.26-2.36). In the invited cohort, only a slight association with screening history persisted (regular vs. non-participant; RR 1.20 95% CI 1.04-1.40). Highly educated under-screened mothers of the invited cohort showed a higher probability of receiving a Pap test after the vaccination campaign period (RR 1.27 95% CI 1.04-1.56) compared with those not invited,

conclusionActive invitation could increase overall HPV immunisation coverage and reduce socio-demographic inequalities and the association with mothers' screening participation.

Indexed as

AdultChildEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusFemaleHealth PromotionHumansItalyMiddle AgedMothersNuclear FamilyPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationhealth inequalitiesimmunizationinfectionpreventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID28951407
PMCPMC5722088
OpenAlexW2757260791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.