Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28951270›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery2018

Prognostication of Survival Outcomes in Patients Diagnosed with Glioblastoma.

Damir Nizamutdinov, Eileen M Stock, Jad A Dandashi, Eliana A Vasquez, Ying Mao, Samantha Dayawansa, Jun Zhang, Erxi Wu, Ekokobe Fonkem, Jason H Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prognostication in Hospice Care: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Importance of Functional Status.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Damir NizamutdinovTexas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott and White Health Care, Temple, Texas, USA.
Eileen M StockCooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center (CSPCC), VA Maryland Health Care System, Perry Point, Maryland, USA.
Jad A DandashiTexas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.
Eliana A VasquezTexas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA.
Ying MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Samantha DayawansaTexas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott and White Health Care, Temple, Texas, USA.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Erxi WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott and White Health Care, Temple, Texas, USA.
Ekokobe FonkemTexas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott and White Health Care, Temple, Texas, USA.
Jason H HuangTexas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott and White Health Care, Temple, Texas, USA. Electronic address: Jason.Huang@bswhealth.org.

Funding

Use of Engineered Nervous Tissue Constructs to Repair Extensive Nerve InjuryR01NS067435 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HUANG, JASON H. · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS067435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain tumor with dismal survival. This study aims to examine the prognostic value of primary tumor sites and race on survival outcomes.

methodsPatient data obtained from the Scott and White Hospital Brain Tumor Registry (1976-2013) were stratified according to sex, age, race, primary tumor site, vital status, and survival.

resultsOf the 645 patients, 580 (89.9%) were diagnosed with GBM not otherwise specified (GBM NOS), 57 (8.8%) with GBM, and 8 (1.2%) with giant-cell GBM. Most were male (53.5%), aged 50 years or older (78.7%). The white population had the highest GBM prevalence (87.1%) and the lowest overall survival versus all other race groups (6.6% vs. 30.1%; P < 0.01). The black population had a relatively low prevalence of GBM (5.9%) and the greatest overall survival versus all others (47.4% vs. 7.3%; P < 0.01). Primary tumor sites located in the temporal (25.8% vs. 20.2%; P = 0.03), occipital (8.1% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.05), and parietal lobes (24.2% vs. 20.8%; P = 0.05) had a greater occurrence in surviving individuals. The overall survival for men versus women was (62.9% vs. 37.1%; P = 0.12).

conclusionsBlack racial background and temporal, occipital, or parietal primary tumor sites are suggestive of positive survival outcomes. Conversely, white racial background with primary tumor sites in the brain overlapping and NOS areas seem to be associated with negative outcomes and decreased survival. Thus, racial background and primary tumor site may be useful prognostic factors in patients with GBM.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGlioblastomaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateEpidemiologyGlioblastomaPrognostic factorsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID28951270
PMCPMC5729086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.