Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28951263›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2018

Prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after cesarean is associated with reduced risk of surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lulu Yu, Ryan J Kronen, Laura E Simon, Carolyn R T Stoll, Graham A Colditz, Methodius G Tuuli

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03414762 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Obese Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwell HealthRan2019 to 2022Enrolled153ConditionsCesarean Section Complications, Cesarean Wound, Dehiscence, Cesarean Wound DisruptionArmsPICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, Standard Dressing
NCT03855735 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

"Sufficiency, Accuracy, Clarity, Contextualization, and Interpersonal Adaptation - Safe, Digitally Supported Communication in Gynecology and Obstetrics: TeamBaby"

TypeinterventionalSponsorJacobs University Bremen gGmbHRan2019 to 2023Enrolled424ConditionsPregnancy RelatedArmsTeamBaby Online Communication Training (IG1) and TeamBaby Web-App Communication Training (IG2)
NCT04455724 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Negative Pressure Incisional Wound Therapy for High-risk Ventral Hernia Repair: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled110ConditionsVentral HerniaArmsNegative pressure incisional wound therapy, Standard sterile dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Intravenous compared with oral iron for the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Single-use negative pressure wound therapy to prevent surgical site complications in high-risk patients undergoing caesarean sections: a real-world study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Observational
  17. Article
  18. Meta-analysis of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infections (SSI) in caesarean section surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lulu YuWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO. Electronic address: lulu.yu@wustl.edu.
Ryan J KronenWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Laura E SimonBecker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Carolyn R T StollDepartment of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Graham A ColditzWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Institute for Public Health, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Methodius G TuuliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Optimizing Management of the Second Stage of Labor: Multicenter Randomized TrialU01HD077384 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CAHILL, ALISON G, TUULI, METHODIUS GAMUO · 2014 to 2019
$7.8M
Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Obese Women at Cesarean: Multicenter Randomized TrialR01HD086007 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI HARPER, LORIE M, TUULI, METHODIUS GAMUO · 2016 to 2019
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086007NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD077384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study was to assess the effect of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy on surgical site infections and other wound complications in women after cesarean delivery. DATA SOURCES: We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy with standard wound dressing for cesarean delivery. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsThe primary outcome was surgical site infection after cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes were composite wound complications, wound dehiscence, wound seroma, endometritis, and hospital readmission. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgin's I

resultsSix randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies in high-risk mostly obese women met inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Six were full-text articles, 2 published abstracts, and 1 report of trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov. Studies were also heterogeneous in the patients included and type of negative-pressure wound therapy device. The risk of surgical site infection was significantly lower with the use of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy compared with standard wound dressing (7 studies: pooled risk ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.66; adjusted risk ratio, -6.0%, 95% confidence interval, -10.0% to -3.0%; number needed to treat, 17, 95% confidence interval, 10-34). There was no evidence of significant statistical heterogeneity (I

conclusionStudies on the effectiveness of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy at cesarean delivery are heterogeneous but suggest a reduction in surgical site infection and overall wound complications. Larger definitive trials are needed to clarify the clinical utility of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy after cesarean delivery.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyFemaleHumansOdds RatioPostoperative CarePregnancySurgical Wound DehiscenceSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment Outcomeantibioticscesarean deliverydehiscenceendometritishospital readmissionmeta-analysisprophylactic negative-pressure wound therapyseromasurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID28951263
PMCPMC5807120
OpenAlexW2760149625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.