Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28951057›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nutrition education and behavior2018

A Low-Cost, Grab-and-Go Breakfast Intervention for Rural High School Students: Changes in School Breakfast Program Participation Among At-Risk Students in Minnesota.

Nicole Larson, Qi Wang, Katherine Grannon, Susan Wei, Marilyn S Nanney, Caitlin Caspi

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of school meal nudge interventions to improve youth food behaviors.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole LarsonDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Electronic address: larsonn@umn.edu.
Qi WangBiostatistical Design and Analysis Center, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Katherine GrannonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Program in Health Disparities Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Susan WeiDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Marilyn S NanneyDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Program in Health Disparities Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Caitlin CaspiDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Program in Health Disparities Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Improving High School Breakfast EnvironmentsR01HL113235 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BERGE, JERICA M · 2013 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the impact of a grab-and-go component embedded within a larger intervention designed to promote School Breakfast Program (SBP) participation.

designSecondary data analysis.

settingRural Minnesota high schools.

participantsEight schools were enrolled in the grab-and-go only intervention component. An at-risk sample of students (n = 364) who reported eating breakfast ≤3 d/wk at baseline was enrolled at these schools.

interventionsGrab-and-go style breakfast carts and policies were introduced to allow all students to eat outside the cafeteria.

main outcome measuresAdministrative records were used to determine percent SBP participation (proportion of non-absent days on which fully reimbursable meals were received) for each student and school-level averages. ANALYSIS: Linear mixed models.

resultsSchool-level increases in SBP participation from baseline to the school year of intervention implementation were observed for schools enrolled in the grab-and-go only component (13.0% to 22.6%). Student-level increases in SBP participation were observed among the at-risk sample (7.6% to 21.9%) and among subgroups defined by free- or reduced-price meal eligibility and ethnic or racial background. Participation in SBP increased among students eligible for free or reduced-price meals from 13.9% to 30.7% and among ineligible students from 4.3% to 17.2%. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Increasing access to the SBP and social support for eating breakfast are effective promotion strategies.

Indexed as

BreakfastFood ServicesAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMinnesotaRural PopulationSchool Health ServicesSchoolsStudentsbreakfastmealsoutcome assessmentschoolsstudents

Identifiers

PMID28951057
PMCPMC5807125
OpenAlexW2760316813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.