ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2017
Spatiotemporal fractionation schemes for liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.
Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Precise Reirradiation Supporting Tool Initiative (PRISTIN) for Prescribing Absorbed Dose and Number of Fractions in Reirradiation.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for spatiotemporal fractionation schemes.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Technical Note: A step-by-step guide to Temporally Feathered Radiation Therapy planning for head and neck cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Article
- Impact of potentially variable RBE in liver proton therapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
- Temporally feathered intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A planning technique to reduce normal tissue toxicity.Medical physics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeDose prescription in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors is often limited by the mean liver dose. We explore the concept of spatiotemporal fractionation as an approach to facilitate further dose escalation in liver SBRT. MATERIALS AND
methodsSpatiotemporal fractionation schemes aim at partial hypofractionation in the tumor along with near-uniform fractionation in normal tissues. This is achieved by delivering distinct dose distributions in different fractions, which are designed such that each fraction delivers a high single fraction dose to complementary parts of the tumor while creating a similar dose bath in the surrounding noninvolved liver. Thereby, higher biologically effective doses (BED) can be delivered to the tumor without increasing the mean BED in the liver. Planning of such treatments is performed by simultaneously optimizing multiple dose distributions based on their cumulative BED. We study this concept for five liver cancer patients with different tumor geometries.
resultsSpatiotemporal fractionation presents a method of increasing the ratio of prescribed tumor BED to mean BED in the noninvolved liver by approximately 10-20%, compared to conventional SBRT using identical fractions.
conclusionsSpatiotemporal fractionation may reduce the risk of liver toxicity or facilitate dose escalation in liver SBRT in circumstances where the mean dose to the non-involved liver is the prescription-limiting factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.